Search results

67 @Neptune adding a jk to your post will make the rules lawyers happy.

Thank you for the nomination, but I shall have to decline.

Love to see it. For

For

Very nice!

For

For. 100%. Another beautifully crafted commend. Not to gush, but the tl/dr could be "Thanks to Sil, TNP has nice things."

I've brought the shot glasses. Cheers! :bar:

Justice: 1. Nutmeg The Squirrel 2. Vivanco 3. Picairn Would you like to reopen nominations? No

Simone, I beg to differ. The legal code also states: "5. Security Councilors must meet the same influence and endorsement requirements as applicants to the Council, and may be suspended or removed if they fail to do so." With the continued erosion of WA members, the SC has seen influence...

We don't want it to be too low, and we can't let it remain too high. I don't think getting rid of it altogether is preferable. Having standards goes hand in hand with the RA's desire to require SC members to maintain high levels of endorsements and influence. Let's try and figure out where the...

Thanks for bringing this up, Gorundu. I agree a change is in order. Additionally, if the downward trend in WA nations continues, the minimum endo requirement could exceed the maximum allowable. While entry barriers ought to be high, they shouldn't be impossible. I would suggest lowering the...

Is actually a - wtf is that?

Is actually a koala.

Justice: 1. < Attempted Socialism > 2. < Nutmeg The Squirrel > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

If this passes, Simone, TNP's author of 10,000 resolutions, will lose his cushy corner office on the 22nd floor. Since I would hate to see that happen, I am - Against.

What DMs? I haven't the slightest notion of what you are talking about.

For

Thank you for respecting the confidentiality of your sources. This is the kind of integrity which is a cornerstone of our great region.

Delegate: < Chipoli > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Vice Delegate: < Simone > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Speaker: < Matzerati > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes >

On principle, my DMs are sacrosanct. It would take an Act of Flemingovia for me to even acknowledge their existence.

Criminalizing election-related DMs would be opening a particularly sticky can of worms. For example, anyone not on "the list" could very easily entrap a candidate while in the midst of any old conversation. This law would clearly have a chilling effect on a candidate's ability to engage in...

From the BoR: "Each Nation's rights to free speech, free press, and the free expression of religion shall not be infringed, and shall be encouraged, by the governmental authorities of the region and its territories." The RA would be overstepping it's authority by enacting limitations on this...

I'm curious how it made it this far. Against

I nominate @Simone for Vice Delegate.

I am happy to have Tlomz return to the SC.

IDK Portuguese, but google translate gave me: "You say FU. Become an Emperor hotel!"

Against

Let's look at a current example. News from Bangladesh. Bangladesh, a country I have paid zero attention to since George Harrison did a benefit concert for the millions of starving children there. For me to assess what is true and what is false pertaining to stories coming out of Bangladesh is a...

What are we doing here? Are we making up a new rule to try and get rid of someone who is unpopular? Let's assume the targeted individual isn't around. Now - do we want to require everyone making a statement to cite their source? Do we want it to be against the rules to say, "I read somewhere...