Search results

Perhaps then something like: I'm not inclined to restrict the Speaker to always doing this and would prefer to allow the Speaker the leeway to use their judgement on such matters.

This feels awkwardly worded. Not sure how I'd fix it.

This bill is intended to amend the Regional Assembly Rules to allow a proposer to withdraw a proposal whilst it's at vote if some fatal flaw is discovered at that point rather than going through the rigmarole of a vote and then either resubmitting it or amending it at a later date. I think...

Mr Delegate, The Chief Justice Selection (Amendment) Bill has been passed by the Regional Assembly and is now presented for your signature or veto. If no action is taken by your office in seven (7) days, the legislation will become law.

This should be enough for the government to auto-against this.

This feels far too niche to be covered by the WA.

Which would apply to at least, at a conservative estimate, half a dozen channels that I know exist or existed that have never been archived. Given your close association both with the government over the last several years and the archival process, where are those archives? I don't believe the...

If this is the case, where are the archives of the all the channels in use in the Executive server? I'm not the Speaker, I'm asking as a citizen and deputy speaker.

Has Section 7.4.36 of the Legal Code been interpreted to apply to channels still in active use?

I am so fed up with people saying this. Fash, wherever they reside, must be opposed and it is always in TNP's interests to attack fascists. The RP community suffered zero negative affects from the raid and indeed, most people in it didn't even know it happened.