Search results

How ya doing Roman?

This would be two :p

So after we repeal this, have we won the war?

I'm pretty sure Tlomz is dead. Dibs on his stuff!

You need an enacting clause.

A very quick rise comparatively but everything I've heard about you suggests that this is fully deserved. I do have a question about the Chief of Staff role - what responsibilities and functions does the Chief of Staff, and how will their role look in your Ministry?

Honestly? A better name means I probably don't vote against it.

Against due to the name.

Delegate: 1. < Pallaith >

No thanks

Nominate @Pallaith

On anything that isn't legislation, a second is always necessary.

"Bad resolutions are good when they fit our purposes" is a garbage standard to hold ourselves, before even getting into the fact that these resolutions frequently prove entirely unnecessary and are quickly repealed. It's just badge hunting, except now it's just badge hunting with the most...

TNP last resolution: the resolution is sub-par and says nothing about TBH TNP this resolution: yes let's blindly follow the most generic trash resolution ever to hit the SC because we need libjuncts to even have a hope of winning on the battlefield This region should stop pretending to care...

Delegate: < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes > Vice Delegate: < Sil Dorsett > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Speaker: < AraFuttio > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

This would be much better for the Election Commission to deal with, especially if we eventually get into a situation where the make up of the EC makes UTC, for whatever reason, less appropriate to use.

The lack of endorsements on your nation is a concern. I seem to recall a similar lack of endorsements, and a long transitioon, during a previous delegacy of yours. I know from experience a lengthy transition can raise questions over competence both at home and abroad and put pressure on an...

Embarassing to see people lining to vote in favour of this.

I decline all my nominations but reserve the right to accept any nominations made in my name after this post.

Nicely done.

And then Robespierre ragequit the region.

I move this for a vote, and request a truncated formal debate period of three days.

Gonna give this today for any further feedback before moving into formal debate.

I have updated the draft with the changed wording.

Perhaps then something like: I'm not inclined to restrict the Speaker to always doing this and would prefer to allow the Speaker the leeway to use their judgement on such matters.

This feels awkwardly worded. Not sure how I'd fix it.

This bill is intended to amend the Regional Assembly Rules to allow a proposer to withdraw a proposal whilst it's at vote if some fatal flaw is discovered at that point rather than going through the rigmarole of a vote and then either resubmitting it or amending it at a later date. I think...

Mr Delegate, The Chief Justice Selection (Amendment) Bill has been passed by the Regional Assembly and is now presented for your signature or veto. If no action is taken by your office in seven (7) days, the legislation will become law.

This should be enough for the government to auto-against this.

This feels far too niche to be covered by the WA.