Search results

Some would say that this type of "grass roots" movement is exactly the type of rhetoric that JAL was using prior to his coup. How would you respond?

EDIT: Just to be clear, I've taken off the Mall persona for this post. I'm not speaking on behalf of NS Moderation, just as a single player who is also a Mod. END EDIT I'm not interested in getting into a back and forth debate regarding all the pros and cons of NS Moderation so I'll keep this...

I hoped this was real.

I thank this Court for its time, and gently remind whatever remains of the shattered husk of the Court that by resolving this R4R it has allowed for a few other R4R facing the Court to go through, ultimately ending with a counting of the vote held waaaay back in December on my Emergency...

It is nice that I can take a roughly 3 week break from NS and not have missed anything on this front. Will the Court provide semi regular updates for us? Maybe once every three or four days? Just so we know this isn't falling off again.

Back in my day TSP ran everything on time. The efficiency of my government is legendary. Please extend a formal invitation to TSP that if they would like the SPSR to take the reigns back it can certainly be arranged.

Not to be that guy, but isn't it February currently?

Is this not happening?

In these exciting times of general governmental incompetence TNP has seen a wave of new political parties. While there is no doubt that they will all die out within the month, this is a friendly reminder that the Regressive Party is here to stay, and those who do not join will be dealt with...

Gladio could always say that those aren't government records at all. After all, they're just conversations he's having with individuals who haven't taken oaths of office about we-don't-know-what yet are apparently important enough in other contexts to warrant hidden forum areas.

Considering the fact that Owenstacey has vacated their office by failing to log in, that seems unlikely. If the Court needs a replacement I volunteer as tribute.

Oh that's very nice.

Oh. So you're doing it all offsite. You're having hidden communications with non-governmental entities (who haven't sworn an oath as all government officials must) about secret TNP stuff offsite. That's comforting.

TNP RA Given Unprecedented Opportunity to Hold Officials Accountable and Encourage Court Functionality: "No Thanks" Says RA In an unprecedented act nearly two weeks ago respected TNP Citizen Mall brought to the RA a motion to recall the three Temporary Hearing Officers who went incommunicado...

We're coming up on the one month anniversary of when the brief submission window closed :voldy:

The law is quite clear. At least one. I used the lowest possible number. That is one voting session as the law requires. The Speaker's interpretation appears to be correct, I may have miscounted slightly when I ran my numbers but I have no issue with their current requirement since it is satisfied.

Read the law that I posted. I need one third of the quorum number, and the law is clearly designed to take the lesser of the three elections as the baseline for quorum.

My nefarious plan of getting this all resolved and over with is proceeding exactly has I have foreseen. To the Court: understanding that RL issues come up, do you have anything resembling an accurate timeline on this?

I'm invoking RA Rule 1.4 and moving that this proceed to a vote despite the objections. Per: I need one ninth of the number of votes in the "Closing Legal Loopholes" vote, in which there were 25 votes. So I need 3 people, including myself. I need two others.

I second all of Clean Land's motions.

All in good fun. Against.

tl;dr to all the objections: "Our Court has a history, nay a Tradition! of sucking, and so we are understanding when the Court lies to us about timelines and whatnot. That is expected here in TNP, and to attempt to change the culture of incompetence is to strike at the very core of the region."

Yay

Ok so ignoring my motion in the OP, I motion this to a vote. Again.

The motion, having been moved and seconded, requires only the Speaker to schedule a vote.

Allow me to explain: Someone appointed three people I've never heard of to handle an extremely complex and important request for review, The period for brief submission closed on January 3, Those people promised an answer by January 10 at the latest, One of them posted on January 19 saying...

I motion that the Regional Assembly recall Owenstacey, Sasten, and Cogoria from their position of Temporary Hearing Officers in the Request For Review dated 12/24/17.

I'll take that as a "Quiet you, stop letting the proles know that we're creating a cabal and subverting the government."

It would be beyond absurd for TNP to have to recall THO's. That having been said, if a ruling isn't posted by noon Eastern Standard Time on Monday the 22nd I will go to the RA. If this doesn't light a fire of some sort under the THO's then frankly I don't know what will.

So they're not going to get forum access to areas normal citizens can't see or anything right? Since they're not government officials and have absolutely no legal authority distinct from any other citizen of TNP?