Search results

I am for this proposal. It demonstrates clearly the redundancy of that which it aims to repeal.

For the reasons mentioned by Pallaith, I am against this proposal.

I have a serious quibble over whether this is an international issue. It is not so much that it is not, but rather that the preamble does not even attempt to justify its international nature. I will reluctantly vote against this, unless persuaded otherwise.

I am against this proposal, for reasons that are identical to why I was against its predecessor. Though I certainly wouldn’t call this proposal in bad faith or deceptive, I do disagree with the arguments.

I am firmly against this proposal. This is a good policy, but it is poorly executed, likely as a result of a lack of drafting. It is a shame, however, about the collateral damage caused by the quorum-raid against this proposal.

I am somewhat torn on this. On the one hand, it is a good parody of You’re a Mean One, and it does point out that the targeted resolution went to vote rather early. On the other hand, I rather like the targeted resolution, and this proposal doesn’t reference parts of NationStates as well as the...

Bother, I want a unicorn. I would agree that a proposal cannot actively rely on the infallibility of gnomes to do anything substantive. A proposal that simply passes all governance over to committees on the basis that committees are perfect would be a bad, of amusing, proposal. However, it has...

For

For

I am in favour of this proposal. CoCR might well be a sacred cow, but there is the potential of a far superior bovine.

I am for this proposal.

I am against this proposal. There are three prongs to the proposal’s argument as to why the targeted resolution should be repealed, and I will address these in turn. First, there is the suggestion that the standard of good faith is too low. The requirement that is set by the targeted resolution...

This is micromanagement to the extreme. Not only is it micromanagement, it wouldn’t be a good policy even if implemented at the macroscopic level. I am against this proposal and likely also against any future iterations thereof.

I am, of course, entirely in favour of this proposal. The legislation contains a comprehensive set of regulations for the advancement of vital protections for international travellers.

I am entirely against this repeal.

I am for this proposal. This is an excellent commendation for impressively dedicated and detailed roleplay.

Infants being nourished is a good thing. This proposal helps to achieve that. Therefore, I am for the proposal.

I am slightly cautious about de facto commending someone who, due to no longer being active on the game, has not explicitly agreed thereto. However, due to the creativity of the use of the declaration, the quality of writing, and the impressiveness of Borlands’ collective achievements, I am...

My comments on this proposal have not changed very much from when this was last proposed. I find this repeal unpersuasive. The first clause is an acceptable boilerplate, on which I have no comments. The second is absurd, however. Since this mandate is an encouragement, a member-nation would...

For

For

I withdraw my criticism. Instead, I shall redirect my energy to praise of your precision at hitting exactly the character limit.

That preamble is too short. There is no indication of the benefit that comes from whistleblowing beging protected. Nor of why the steps taken in the active clauses are necessary to achieve the preambulatory aim. With that said, the active clauses are comprehensive, handling the topic in good...

I am in favour of this proposal.

Simone has provided many excellent reasons to vote in favour of this. Therefore, I will do so.

I am quite strongly for this. These mandates are very comprehensive, and that comprehensiveness is indicative of appropriate regulation and a detailed examination of policy.

I have been considering this repeal at some length. I have decided that I must vote against it. The repeal does present an excellent format, with numbered clauses, allowing for easy reference. I commend that. The first argument of the repeal is that the definition of a “sophisticated...

I pledge loyalty to The North Pacific and its territories, obedience to her laws, and responsible action as a member of her society. I pledge to only register one nation to vote in The North Pacific. I pledge that no nation under my control will wage war against the North Pacific and its...

I, Kenmoria, do hereby solemnly swear that during my term as Deputy Minister of World Assembly Affairs, I will uphold the ideals of Democracy, Freedom, and Justice of The Region of The North Pacific. I will use the powers and rights granted to me through The North Pacific Constitution and Legal...

Congratulations on a well-earned rest, Magecastle, and congratulations on the new role, Simone.