Search results

who had just

7

1

I second Lord Noah and would like to know the motivations behind the proposal.

You shan’t.

fried wonton on

1

The changes made are sufficient enough, I support all amendments presented.

34

1

6

4

4

5

I’m fine with this, still preferably would like the percentage to be lowered or changed to the endo cap and also lowered.

I agree with the above statement and have no further comments on this. I support this decision.

8

37

3

1002 cans of spam on the wall, 1002 cans of spam! Take one down, pass it around, 1001 cans of spam on the wall!

Court Justice: 1. < Vivanco > 2. < Lord Dominator > 3. < Eluvatar > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

You for sure have my vote.

952

1699

3

Ah alright. Then my earlier opinion still stands.

6

Upon rereading, I now believe it'd be better if 5.27 were removed entirely since it's already written that Delegates may eject anyone who has surpassed the endorsement cap of the respective region. Alternatively, 5.27 could be rewritten so that delegates must eject nations that exceed a certain...

I would like an explanation for why judicial elections should be discarded with. If we are to do so then justices should be appointed not by the decision of the Delegate alone. Perhaps another position such as the Speaker could also require approval of a justice’s appointment. In general though...

1