Search results

Can you detail and explain the rationale for the recent changes you made to the standing procedures?

You know, it's pretty hot outside where I am, so I appreciate the opportunity to cool off in all this shade! :shades:

All of these suggestions are being taken into account. I will endeavor sometime next week to summarize the debate thus far and present options for how to move forward with a second draft. Thank you to everyone for your feedback and ideas.

The administrative team has reached a decision to ban the player, Lord Ravenclaw, from all offsite properties of The North Pacific, including the forum and official Discord servers. The ban is effective immediately, and it will remain in place for a minimum of 12 months. After that point, an...

Sonsolium does not pass admin checks - please log in from a home residential IP and PM me.

I would have had no idea that WA-blocking tag raids were discussed in the executive council chat had MJ not revealed it in this thread.

I respectfully decline.

I respectfully decline.

Janus and 1Damnits1 are masked. Aleura passes admin checks.

Use the report feature in the future. I'll remove the post.

1Damnits1 passes admin checks

Janus passes admin checks.

@pinhead @King Prindor Both pass admin check, masked.

Masked those four.

Done

Allow me to address some of the questions that have been raised about this bill so far: As the bill currently stands, enactment would not be delayed to the end of the term, but there is an implementation clause that essentially says if there are any ongoing prosecutions, they will continue under...

Done

@Mas Mexa passes, masked

Removed the gravedigging posts. The Federalist does not pass admin checks.

Basically, the on-site ban can't last longer than the forum ban. So if the forum admin team bans someone until, say, May 15th, the delegate can't use that to justify an on-site ban past that date. If the admin team bans for a year, the delegate can't them indefinitely. Etc. I'll have a response...

Done

The ban is only legal if it's in compliance with the Constitution and Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights says they must have "immediate recourse to judicial review" following a ban. I am not sure what the current process is for offering such nations that recourse, but presumably the standard...

Done

Another thing to consider is that judicial review typically takes place on our forum. How would a forum-banned nation be able to exercise their right to judicial review? Generally, the law has been agnostic of forum bans, essentially ignoring if a user has been banned from the forum for purposes...

Aye

One thought that occurs to me is that it can be difficult to prove that any given nation is associated with a given forum account if the owner of both does not want it proven. If a nation so banned exercises their right to judicial review of the matter, or brings charges against the delegate for...

All done. Both NPA applicants were passed and masked. Note also that Acria/Hardonius is forum banned already, so no remasking was required.

I think delegate involvement should be necessary for the same reason that it's necessary to enter into a treaty - the executive branch handles our foreign affairs directly, albeit with the oversight of the citizenry. When foreign powers deal with our government, they need to know that they are...

Peolt passes, masked.

Yavin Republic masked. Peolt fails admin checks - please log in from a residential IP and then PM me. EDIT: Peolt passes now.