Recent content by Sybarropesee

8

10

Congratulations to elected justices. It was a great experience for me to participate in this election. Thankyou. You really helped me with understanding the legal code with your case study.

Citizenship Nation: Sybarropesse Card Collecting Nation: Sybarropesse I acknowledge my obligations under the Charter of The North Pacific Cards Guild and agree to comply with these obligations.

Hello, I would like to request for a mentor for world assembly affairs in the field of IFVs, I wish to contribute with people on IFVs and need some guidance on it

Nation in The North Pacific: Sybarropesse Current World Assembly nation: Sybarropesse Discord Username (if applicable): AGB Gaming Are you able to attend operations at 12AM/12PM EST? And if so, which times can you attend? Both 12 AM/PM EST Which branch (the Special Forces or Auxiliary) do you...

Court Justice: < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

The major issue the case had was related to RMB. The sections I mentioned focused on delegates power moderating the RMB. In an actual case, the delegate might put forth clause 22 in front of justices to justify the actions they took. Whereas the accused nation might put clause 23 or have an...

As things stand the legal code covers pretty much everything. We must ensure that the citizens should regularly get updated about cases and there verdicts. Justices shall also address the citizen on a lot of occasions about cases and educate the citizens to follow the legal code. Justices can...

You mentioned that i should look at chapter 7, I put forth the section 7.3 and it's 2 clauses 22 and 23 that may also get involved in the case

I believe you are talking about section 7.3 clause 22? If that's the case then the case will also work under section 7.3 clause 23. Plus the act conducted by the delegate is not protected under section 7.3 clause 22 as no such suspicious activity was done on RMB.

The delegate does not hold that supreme authority. Additionally the delegate is assuming that the nation "would" post something violating "their" Policy. The nation can apply for judicial review and charge the delegate under Section 3.5.28 and 3.5.32

According to the legal code, the act done by the nation violates the criminal code. As no criminal case was lodged and for banning a nation the delegate was forced to ask the court for banning the nation prior to actually banning the nation. I would also like to bring clause 32 of section 3.5...

The delegate first must tell if the permission from court was given under 3.5.28 The nation will be convicted under 1.3.12

The delegate needs to openly tell the court that under what clauses in the RMB is the nation was banned. If the clauses are mentioned in the RMB then I truly believe that banning the nation was the right call and the delegate is not guilty. However if the court finds that there is no such clause...