Recent content by Elfnotonashelf

Against

For. Well made argument so I see no reason why this shouldn't pass.

In terms of NS only, one cannot use a previous states name within 10 years of the previous name being inactive. I'm not entirely sure of how it works on the forum though.

I would vote for this. There are some minor issues present that others have articulated however this is a step forward and as such I believe it should pass.

Given there is a potential replacement (Well written). I'll change my vote.

For I do note the. Change in vote, however given simones response I see no reason why I shouldn't support the repeal.

For Completely agree with Simone on this one. Also side note I would for the replacement as well as this repeal

Against Mostly based on national sovereignty and I do not believe this should be handled by the WA. Each member nation should be free to tackle this issue as they see fit. Moreover this places an undue burden on governments that is both impractical and does not take into account each nations own...

Against Clause 2.1 states accorindg to each nations own level of medical science, given that how can several nations join together as they would not all have the same level of medical science. To expanded on that again how would this work say with an university that has a lab that has a higher...

For Magecastle has answered concerns admirably on this thread and as such I see no logical reason to vote against.

Against

For.

Court Justice: < St George Would you like to reopen nominations? < no >

For. I've got to say magecastle damm I'm impressed, you've taken what's been said previously and turned it around perfectly. Top job.

Tentatively for I agree with the principle and it is written fairly well however Clause 8 seems fairly nonsensical to me.