Recent content by WalfoPacificCommunication

Hello all! Happy to answer any questions on my resolution! This is a simple (already in AED's IRL) piece of technology. It is a part of the AED system, as it must measure how much voltage the shock must be to have the greatest chance of restarting the heart. If the AED detects that the heart is...

GA 82 I think covers the opposition I have faced over this! If you guys see that, perhaps a recount?

Of course, I just believe you are asking for too much, in sections that are perfectly applicable, and are being over exaggerated,

I think the wording is fine, and you should see past these minor perceived flaws. The proposal as a whole is something that is necessary to implement, for the safety of everyone. No matter what, this will improve the safety behind genetic modifications, and rid you of these fears, which many...

As something that has been done before, for the generally safe question, what about GA 492? GMs would follow its qualifications, and then, such specific wording would be repetitive.

Let me repeat this which was said on the forums: Adequate training is, by all means, "adequate" as interpreted by the eyes of the scientific community. There seems to be a trend in the WA that everything needs to be judicialized to the very last word, and not even a comma can escape the...

GA 111 and GA 218 already set standards for patient care, and the safety of medical devices/research, so the reason such word choices were made was to prevent repetition. This should solve, and make clear to everyone who is voting against why this was done. It already exits!

Adequate training is, by all means, "adequate" as interpreted by the eyes of the scientific community. There seems to be a trend in the WA that everything needs to be judicialized to the very last word, and not even a comma can escape the suffocating grasp of its intoxicating bureaucracy. We...

The first comment, if they join together they should have a combined sense of there status, so this works Second, see this comment. https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=526260&p=40251162&hilit=generally+safe#p40251162 See this comment too for context...

I am free to answer questions about this resolution from anyone to try and sway support. The North Pacific's opinion matters very much to me.

Please take a look, and give feedback to this, my second take: https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=506501&p=38752884#p38752884 Please grant advice, so that this can pass, after we fix what was wrong.

For the appropriate compensation, that is up to the nation in question. With the "unnecessarily", look above.

For your micromanaging comments, quote Ara: "lt may appear micromanagery because we intend to remove a previous resolution (GAR #34) on transport regulations that should not just open up new venues of proposals now that there's an AoE for Transport regulations but also will remove requirements...

Hello everybody I am Walfo, but you can call me Waffles. Feel free to ask me questions, and perhaps I can sway some opinions!