Recent content by Picairn

But what if DS1 was appointed 2 months ago, then DS2 was appointed a week ago, having served for 3 months previously in the office (longer than DS1) and then took a 1-year break? Wouldn't it be unfair for DS1 to be passed over despite possessing more recent experience?

Aye

No issues with me, will support.

Aye

You should have pinged me :shakefist: Thanks for the medal though!

Aye

"Essentially everything" isn't a real argument because you pointed to nothing. "We will stoop so low as to falsely attack our opponents with lies and half-truths when they go DM campaigning." isn't the winning argument you think it is.

"You started this." No, I did not. If I did, I'd have pulled Chipoli's inactivity as MoFA and VD as ammunition to blast him with. This is utterly unhinged. Are you trying to be intentionally obtuse or insane? Again, no, this is a lie. My Delegacy started off very strong with the revival of our...

How in the world is that your takeaway from this.

It is neither "whining" nor "crying" to say that it's bad for the Delegate and his officials to engage in personal attacks on his opponent by digging up his past mistakes. Is it now "anti-TNP behaviour" to have some morals and integrity in campaigning? Is it now "anti-TNP behaviour" to ask your...

"Essentially everything" is not a real argument.

Except both you and Chipoli did. Didn't you say earlier I did nothing for the region this term except obstructing the government? Apparently you can't go 5 minutes without resorting to lies and attacks.

Can you name a specific example instead of vagueposting? And point out also where I dug up Chipoli's past mistakes to smear him?

"We will stoop so low as to falsely attack our opponents with lies and half-truths when they go DM campaigning." Only the most high-minded of morals on display.

For