Recent content by Picairn

For because there is a replacement.

For

For

For

Information For Voters Vote FOR "Commend Kranostav" Overview The resolution seeks to commend Kranostav for their many contributions to the World Assembly and to The North Pacific in their service as Delegate, Minister of World Assembly Affairs, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Security Councillor...

Against. I'm sympathetic to arguments in favour of criminalising private torture by non-state actors, but a repeal without replacement is simply terrible. A supplementary resolution to cover for GAR#9's shortcomings without a repeal would be more ideal.

I'd argue that support for better public transportation or electric vehicles to phase out fossil fuel ones would be a vastly superior "piecemeal solution" to cleaner diesel. If the author pursues in that direction, I'd be happy to give my feedback and support.

For

For

Against. "Cleaner diesel fuel" is like "clean coal", it won't help the environment much as long as harmful fossil fuels continue to be used.

Poorly written with ill-defined, vague standards. Against.

This has failed to achieve quorum.

Against, not a condemnable nominee.

For

Against. Reposting my reasoning on the GA forum here: