The legality challenge was about the repeal's numerous mistakes; the grossly offensive part (bearing in mind the author of this repeal has literally - can't make this shit up - roleplayed as Cecil Rhodes's reincarnated spirit in the WA forum and argued in favour of "civilizing backwards...
Maybe. Come to think of it, it's an achievement of sorts: I can't think of anyone else who's written that many resolutions and had all of them repealed. Even some of Charlotte Ryberg's survive.
(Not voting.)
Why anyone would list in a commendation that a player has written four WA resolutions, all four of which have since been repealed, is rather beyond me. This is superb.
(not voting)
I'm sure this will be a popular proposal but it really could have done with being rewritten. As it stands it is a poor law and a complete waste of the opportunity the repeal granted.
Then your argument is with the fundamental game rules, not the resolution, because that simply cannot happen. Once the repeal passes, your nation's mandatory contribution to the WA General Fund will increase in order to fill the funding gap.
I'm not sure you understand what this repeal is saying.
At present, WASP is funded through private donations. The repeal argues that is wrong, because private donors will bias scientific research.
When the repeal passes, WASP will continue to exist - several other resolutions reference it, and...
The replacement planned for this proposal is quite possibly the worst piece of legislation I have ever seen. I'm also amused at the oddity of a "libertarian" supporting an argument that private agencies cannot be trusted and only government funding should be allowed!
The official poll can be found here.
The unofficial poll and further information can be found here.
The poll features several resolutions written by Separatist Peoples and Sciongrad, former/current/? deputy WA ministers for TNP!