Without replacing the stricken clause with something, we are inviting another R4R should a similar situation arise in the future. There was a court ruling that predates the drafting of the current language:
https://forum.thenorthpacific.org/topic/7230575/
Would the proposed change affect the...
I personally wandered off while AG, so yes. I'm pretty sure it caused an issue. But back then, there were no deputies, so things should be smoother now.
I generally support the changes. Some of the procedures have been deleted from the LC, though. Should we put back something to establish a protocol in the event an AG cannot not complete a trial? Do we need a provision for trials which are onging beyond the end of a term?