Picairn for Delegate 2.0 - Mobilis in Mobili

Picairn

The Young Statesman
-
-
-
Pronouns
He/him
TNP Nation
Picairn
Discord
picairn
efi7bYJ.png

Picairn for Delegate!

Mobilis in mobili.

Translated as “Moving within a moving element”, “Moving within motion” or—my favourite version—“Changing with change”, it was the motto of Captain Nemo’s Nautilus submarine, in Jules Verne’s classic novel Twenty Thousand Leagues under the Seas. To me, the motto perfectly encapsulates the need for change, for adaptation, in a volatile and unpredictable environment. Two new Sinker regions have spawned for the first time in years, the National Sovereignty movement has swept through the World Assembly, an offsite community has threatened the North, and rising powers like Talonia have joined our ranks in the Modern Gameplay Compact. These recent events are a reminder of how fast everything can change, and what we decide to do in the next four months will impact our region and the broader world for months, perhaps even years to come.

The rapidly changing circumstances can be uncertain and frightening for all of us, as a region and a community, to navigate and overcome. It is in these times that steady and energetic leadership is called for, to move us through danger and chaos, to overcome new challenges, exploit new opportunities, and bring our region to new heights. As a new year begins, I believe I can rise to this enormous task once more as your Delegate, and so I am officially running for the position a second time.

Those of you who have known me intimately or have worked closely with me before, you can skip the introduction and move to the policy section of this platform. But to those who joined us recently as new citizens, who are unfamiliar with who I am or what I stand for, I look forward to an opportunity to get to know you further, to answer your questions, address your concerns and fight for your interests, at home and abroad.

I originally spawned in The West Pacific in February 2020 but migrated to TNP in April, because I loved (and still love) our vibrant community and democracy. For three years I kept mostly to myself, spending time crafting RP dispatches and news articles. I missed the deltip against TNP in August 2023, but when our region declared war and invaded Solidarity two months later in October, I enlisted in the North Pacific Army without hesitation and joined the Executive Staff to serve our region.

Within a year since that moment, I rapidly climbed up the ranks in the army and government, establishing myself as an energetic officer and hard-working staffer. My signature has all the details you need on my positions and accomplishments, but to give you a brief summary, I served in various Ministries (and the Regional Assembly) as Deputy Minister of Defense, Deputy Speaker (twice), Deputy Minister of Communications (twice), Deputy Minister of Home Affairs (twice), Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Minister of Home Affairs for six days, and Minister of Defense for a full term, all of which prior to being elected Delegate in September 2024. Every position I have served in brought valuable lessons and prepared me for the eventual Delegacy. My proudest accomplishment to date was the capture of the Confederation of Corrupt Dictators, an old enemy of The North Pacific, with the assistance of our allies in July 2024.

Not only am I active and energetic but I am also an outspoken proponent for reform whenever it is necessary. I am not afraid to speak and act in favour of change when the region needs it, and just as my campaign motto suggests, I have brought it to the Delegacy in my first term and I will do it again if I am re-elected as your Delegate, because I believe that reforms are our best solution for adaptation to changing circumstances when our old methods are no longer working. With pride and excitement in my heart, I present to all of you my policies and visions for the upcoming months.

Collaborative and uplifting leadership
My leadership style, ever since I was appointed as Minister of Defense, can be described as collaborative, with guidance and support for those below me to understand and complete our objectives, and to prosper into new leaders. During my tenure as MoD, I spent a great deal of time personally accompanying NPA officers and soldiers alike on operations and gave them advice and encouragement when needed, because aside from knowing that I can’t do everything alone, I recognised that only through patient guidance and mentorship can a new generation of talented people be born and shaped to fit for roles that required experienced leadership and keep the NPA active when I was unable to. Upon being elected to the Delegacy, I have stayed with this approach by broadly setting my expectations to Ministers and giving them room to fulfill, giving support and guidance to Ministers and staffers when they come to me for advice and direction, while mostly taking a step back from direct involvement unless I have ample time to spare or it’s absolutely necessary.

This leadership style, I have found, suits my needs and restrictions best. Direct involvement, or a hands-on approach, can be great for activity from an outside glance, but people who adopt this approach tend to end up burned out or focusing on one or two Ministries at a time only, while the rest are neglected and left to wither. Myself, I have discovered to my dismay that spending time to complete tasks in one Ministry usually distracted me from other affairs or left responses delayed. That’s hardly surprising: the workload of the Delegate is massive. Not only are you managing all six Ministries under your command, each with their own burden of tasks, but you also have to vote on WA resolutions and endotart daily, work on regional security with the Security Council and the NPA’s High Command, solve difficult Foreign Affairs questions with allies and enemies, maintain communication with the Regional Assembly, and generally attend to regional affairs at a strategic level. It is practically impossible (and unsustainable) for one person to tackle all the mundane Ministerial tasks and high-level matters at the same time, and harder still to maintain consistent activity like that for a full term. Therefore, the best approach, in my view, is to regularly collaborate and coordinate with your Ministers to fulfill specific goals and address urgent problems, to maintain a consistent level of activity and achieve the best results possible in line with your agenda and existing limited resources across all Ministries. Spreading yourself out trying to save every failing Ministry and nurse it back to vibrant activity is impractical, and the end results will generally make you feel disappointed, demoralised and unable to get anything done while the government continues to fail.

As we enter a new term with persistent activity problems across all Ministries and the NPA, a consequence of declining interest and activity in the broader region and NationStates at large, I will continue with this approach as your Delegate if re-elected. The problems of burnout and low activity, I believe, can only be solved in the long run by uplifting new talent to replace retiring players, by mentoring and preparing the former for key leadership positions, advising them on how to accomplish your objectives, and encouraging them with awards and recognition.

“No man rules alone,” it is often echoed.

Defense

While the NPA has achieved some great things this term, such as a joint fash bash in The Kerberos Collective and helping to secure the Outback, it is evident that our army continues to struggle with inactivity. This problem can be directly attributed to the moribund Officer’s Corps, which lacks interest and energy to lead operations and energise the soldiers with regular training. Management and leadership continue to fall disproportionately on the shoulders of the NPA High Command, who often have additional duties and obligations in other areas (like Colonels Caius and Kaschovia who are both Ministers), and the Minister of Defense. This is by no means sustainable, and the war against the Brotherhood of Malice can not be won with a declining NPA. It is therefore my opinion that we must return to the basics of focusing inwards and rebuilding our military before taking on large offensive operations against our enemies.

More raids, fewer sieges
Going forward, the NPA needs to be reoriented towards conducting more tag raids and participating in joint raids with our allies. The status quo approach of encouraging our soldiers to join Libcord operations has not worked, as lengthy sieges have virtually destroyed their morale and energy. The fash bash operation in The Kerberos Collective, alongside tag raids, attracted more turnout from our soldiers than liberations and sieges. It is evident that our soldiers are excited by raids far more than liberations, and therefore we should energise them by doing more raids. Our victories from raids can then be used to advertise, recruit and attract newcomers who are eager for adventure and excitement, thereby bolstering our numbers and activity.

Boosting the Auxiliary (and the Militia)
The NPA’s Special Forces division, our main force of updaters, are more glamorous and exciting by the nature of their operations, which is raiding and defending at updates, compared to the Auxiliary who mainly pile during large raids. However, the prospects of being present at update and following complex instructions in real time can be inconvenient for inexperienced newcomers who don’t happen to live in good timezones and deter them from joining the NPA. Thus, if we want to boost our numbers next term, the Auxiliary should be advertised to the region via gameside recruitment and engagement, in various forms like telegrams, dispatches, and RMB interactions, as a low-effort, low-barrier-to-entry alternative to the Special Forces, and likewise for the Militia for gameside residents without a forum or Discord account. If we can successfully encourage and foster a culture where residents sign up for the NPA or the Militia as part of their service to the region, much like obtaining citizenship or joining a Ministry, then our numbers problem can be greatly alleviated. Doubly so for our activity troubles if, during their Auxiliary service, our soldiers discover a taste for the exciting and glamorous operations of the Special Forces, and eagerly commit themselves as new updaters.

Regular (and consistent) training operations
During downtime in between large operations, the NPA should conduct regular operations to keep our soldiers sharp and energised. However, as I have stated earlier, it is difficult to maintain a high and consistent tempo in our training ops as a result of the activity and morale issues plaguing the Officer’s Corps. Therefore, the NPA should commit to at least one training op per week, so as not to burn the High Command and the MoD out while ensuring consistent activity for our soldiers. All officers in the NPA should be asked to lead ops whenever possible with regular reminders and pings. If organising tag raids are too effort-intensive for our officers, lower-effort detags can be hosted as an alternative.

Joint ops with our allies
I need not elaborate much on the benefits of joint ops: they make military operations far more exciting and lively for all those who participate, and tend to attract more turnout as a result. The NPA should commit itself to joint ops with our allies wherever and whenever possible, whether as the lead or the support, whether it be large raids or support piling, to rejuvenate our activity and increase inter-military cooperation with our allies. When it is able, the NPA should also conduct joint ops and invite our allies to participate.

Mentorship and training
At the same time as we induce new blood to join the military, we should patiently assist and educate them on basic soldierly skills of participating and following orders in operations. I wrote the Soldier’s Manual during my tenure as Minister of Defense to address this exact problem, not only to educate newcomers on R/D manoeuvres but also to pass down knowledge for new generations to come. When our new soldiers have demonstrated competency and a commitment to long-term service through regular operations, we should identify promising candidates and convert them into officers with the essentials of leading operations, using R/D tools, and inspiring the lower ranks with their leadership.

I believe that replacing inactive officers with new, active and enterprising ones remain our only sustainable option in the long term to alleviate our inactivity and invigorate the NPA as a whole. The rot in our military has spread from the top to the bottom, with officers’ inactivity affecting general readiness and morale of the lower ranks, and so it must be addressed by ending the rot with fresh replacements of officers.

Recognising our soldiers’ service
It has been regular practice for the NPA to issue ribbons and make forum reports praising soldiers who participated. We also have an NPA card nation to reward our soldiers with cards after large operations. However, we can do more to recognise merit and encourage our soldiers next term, by regularly issuing gameside reports and publicly commending our most skilled and active soldiers during mid-term or end-of-term award contests. We can also design special awards and Discord roles for soldiers who excel in a particular category, such as “Fastest jumper at update”, “Most active soldier”, “Officer with the most opertations led” of the term, etc.

Foreign Affairs

As the NPA struggles with inactivity, Foreign Affairs has become our main arena for geopolitical competition against our enemies. Fortunately, this is a field where we are possessing an advantage. This term, in line with my strategy of expanding our relations and building the “wall” that will surround our enemies, we have made new friends: from the Augustin Alliance with whom we have signed a treaty, to Talonia who recently joined us in the Modern Gameplay Compact and enacted sanctions against BoM, TCB and their allies. In addition, cooperation in the Outback enabled us to re-establish relations with LWU, a prominent raider region who is often at odds with BoM, and reopen our embassy with them.

Closer cooperation with PPO
Our Foreign Affairs direction has witnessed a shift under my administration, with us cooperating more closely with our PPO allies (TWP and the NPO) on matters of mutual interest, such as supporting NatSov in the WA and the enforcement of sanctions. Militarily, aside from the joint TNP/TWP/NPO fash bash in The Kerberos Collective, we have collaborated with TWP (and LWU) to capture the Outback and are presently helping to defend it from external invasions. The NPO played a large role in persuading Sophia to terminate its treaty with Sparkalia, in a victory for MGC sanctions. It is therefore not surprising that I favour the continuance of our close cooperation as Delegate.

Rapproachement with LWU
Military cooperation in the Outback gave us an opportunity to re-establish friendly relations with LWU, and it is my hope that we develop our relationship further in the coming months if I’m re-elected. LWU has long disagreed with BoM on many issues within the raider world, and by investing in friendly relations with the former, we can weaken BoM’s standing and generally draw away their influence in raider unity. I’m open to the possibility of deeper cooperation, such as joint ops, with LWU.

Developing a strong relationship with two new Sinkers
The Outback was recently captured by a coalition of TWP, TNP, LWU, and other participants. TNP has diplomatically recognised and opened embassies with the Outback, as well as the Plains of Perdition. As Delegate, I have expressed how maintaining support for the Outback, one of NationStates’ new GCRs, is highly beneficial for our foreign interests. Likewise for Perdition, I firmly believe that developing our relations further with NS’s two new Sinker regions will be great for us in the long run, perhaps even blossoming into formal alliances.

On Sarovia
I rejected all of their demands for a public apology and refused to meet them, and I intend to continue that stance. I will not bow down to blackmail, but I also do not want to further inflame tensions and instigate another war, so the government will maintain our no-contact policy as is and refrain from aggressive acts. However, if they attack our region onsite, we will be fully prepared to respond with the diplomatic and military strength at our disposal.

A pragmatic, inclusive Foreign Affairs strategy
If we wish to isolate BoM and TCB and weaken their influence, we must expand our network of allies, friends, and partners with pragmatism and inclusitivity – that is, pursuing relations with regions on the basis of mutually beneficial cooperation in areas of interest. If re-elected as Delegate, I would continue this pragmatic approach to our Foreign Affairs as I am doing now, because I believe it would work best when dealing with diverse regions, with diverse ideologies and forms of government.

I currently do not support negotiations or de-escalation with BoM, since our recent attempt ended in failure with fundamental disagreements between both sides. Therefore, if we are to end this war with a favourable peace, we must first gain the upper hand in our diplomatic and military position, by pursuing the policies that I have outlined above.

Reforming the Ambassadors
The Ambassadors were supposed to be our eyes and ears in other regions, advocating for our interests abroad and delivering our publications when asked to. However, they have slowly become glorified couriers who only sporadically deliver publications and do nothing else. I believe the cause for this problem comes from the fact that it is an entry-level position for anyone to apply and join, regardless of their record of competence or activity. Next term, I will enact reforms to the Ambassadorship by purging all existing Ambassadors and start over with a tightened application process. Candidates will need to answer a series of questions on their application to ensure that they are active and competent, and can consistently fulfill tasks as required, such as submitting regular reports and deliver dispatches. This will result in a smaller but more qualified crop of Ambassadors.

From there, regular Ambassadorial reports can be compiled into a separate Foreign Affairs Digest or incorporated into The North Star, modelling after the system currently in use by The Region That Has No Big Banks for the FA section in their regional newspaper. I was fascinated by their Ambassador reports, and see no reason not to adopt this great system. It is certainly superior to dumping all the work on the Minister of Foreign Affairs to research the news and produce it.

Culture

Solving the manpower issue

The Ministry of Culture has suffered greatly from a shortage of active and available manpower to organise and host events this term. My first priority next term, therefore, is to contact players who are active and have experience in this area and ask them to host events regularly.

Discord movie and game nights
Movie nights, hosted by our wonderful Deputy Minister Pry, was a hit during this term, and game nights have also attracted much interest. Thus, I intend to continue organising those events.

Wider, newer regional events
Interactive games and competitions, like trivia nights and flag/avatar contests, are currently under-utilised, which is a shame. There is also a lack of region-wide events while Discord ones are focused on. I would like to see an expansion in the former next term with new, exciting gameside events that can attract participation from our gameside residents, not just Discord ones.

Joint cultural festivals with friends and allies
Unfortunately, the planned inter-regional festival that we were planning with some of our friends and allies, indicated in my first-month report, has been delayed. The complexity and efforts required to plan that event to a successful conclusion has caused me to re-think our approach. I am open to organising less complex and resource-intensive bilateral festivals with one of our allies or friends as a step to organising something much grander, taking into account our existing resources and capabilities at the moment.

Resumption of regular regional polls
We have stopped publishing polls regularly as a result of the aforementioned lack of active manpower. With my priorities next term more inward-focusing, I will commit to publishing regional polls regularly once more with engaging and fun topics. These polls should not be difficult to post consistently.

In my September run, I was opposed to the merger proposal where Comms and Culture would be merged together, and I continue to remain so. In my view, merging both Ministries at a time when both are experiencing manpower shortages would kill one of the two Ministries, as the sitting Minister would likely prioritise existing staffers to focus on one department over another, rendering the other department unable to complete its projects. A departmental system would not help if staffers were directed to do one field of work anyway, leaving the lone Deputy in charge to do everything else.

Communications

Similar to Culture, Communications is suffering from a lack of qualified writers, active editors, podcast hosts, and good designers. While recruitment should be increased to attract more of them, I have decided to adopt a “quality-over-quantity” approach in the mean time, by focusing on quality content and less on regular publications as a result of this shortage. In my mind, it is better to produce high-quality content seldomly than to churn out low-effort, poorly-executed slop on the regular.

TNS: More analyses and unconventional articles, fewer vanilla news reports
Our recent switch to longer, quality analysis articles, like TNP’s WA decline report, and interesting OOC content, such as music reviews, for The North Star has become popular among our citizens and residents. Thus, I am committed to move forward with our switch, with more of these and fewer cookie-cutter news reports, which I believe can be shifted to The Northern Notes. We can also invite guest writers from other regions to contribute with op-eds or analysis articles.

TNN: News reports and poll analyses
The short-form content of TNN is perfectly suited for breaking news and quick poll analyses, and it has been used in that way this term. Going forward, that will be my approach to TNN, to give regular breaking news updates and poll analyses quickly and professionally.

TNL: Commitment to a revival
We failed to revive The Northern Lights during this term as a result of the manpower shortage. Even so, I am committed to publish at least one TNL issue next term, even if I have to take out more of my personal time and attention to do it. I have always had a deep passion for writing news articles and designing beautiful magazines, and it would be a shame if our flagship publication TNL is to remain in limbo forever or abandoned.

NBS Radio: Interviews and roundtable discussions, Call to Serve program
We can host NBS interviews more frequently as an alternative to current text-based ones for TNS, and roundtable discussions around topics like midterm and end-of-term reports. The old Call to Serve program, interviews with NPA Generals to promote enlistment, can also be revived as a method of recruitment. My first priority, however, is to find hosts who can help do these.

Home Affairs

Recruitment

With regards to recruitment, this term we have focused primarily on manual recruitment and posting weekly recruitment lists. These lists have been regularly finished, and I commend Deputy Minister @Petronellania for their commitment and hard work. At my suggestion, Minister Caius has set up an automatic RMB welcome system for new spawns, directing them to the Gameside Advocates and the Handbook for instructions and establishing a pipeline of recruitment via the GAs. Instead of a boilerplate welcome message, newcomers can approach a GA to receive guidance and personalised recruitment. I plan to make more use of the GAs in the months ahead, as recruitment telegrams have produced low returns.

Mentorship
Mentor lists, which include both forum and Discord accounts, are published weekly and mentors are pinged to complete them, but it has been usually inconsistent. I am committed to see mentor lists being published regularly again and asking more mentors to do their work. The GAs are acting as our gameside mentors and recruiters, but their relative autonomy has hampered effective coordination in this area. Therefore, I would integrate the GAs into MoHA as staffers next term by asking them to join the Executive Staff server.

Resource Review
Dispatch design, one of my passions! Over this term we have successfully modernised the government dispatches linked in the regional WFE and updated them with the latest information. The WADP dispatch and some of its related dispatches have also been modernised and updated. We have maintained a uniform design for the dispatches, like the footer and header, which would help us quickly update the rest.

We have also set up a reward system this term, by awarding staffers with points for performing certain tasks and achieving certain milestones, and allowing them to redeem those points for cards with varying rarity. To encourage staffers, I have asked Caius to publicly award and commend staffers who have contributed the most to the Ministry at the end of the term, and I want to continue that practice for next term.

World Assembly Affairs

Maintaining our National Sovereignty alignment

In one of the more notable shifts this term, my administration adopted a strong NatSov alignment and voted against overreaching proposals more regularly, while endeavouring to pass more repeals. I suspect that our switch has jumpstarted the NatSov movement within the GA, with recent passed proposals being mostly repeals. I am committed to maintaining our alignment next term to fight against the current state of the GA, captured by an elite group who writes poorly-thought-out proposals that badly micromanage member nations.

Commends, Commends, and more Commends
Our Commendations for deserving region-mates are still in the works, with progress moving rather slowly. I am committed to see one or more Commends being put to vote and passed by the WA Security Council next term.

Enforcing MGC sanctions
Our enforcement of sanctions in the WA this term has been quite effective, with the last remaining GA resolution on the books, written by a TCB author, being repealed. I have and will enforce the sanctions to the fullest extent with vigour and energy next term.

Encouraging more authorships
This is another goal that I am committed to achieve next term. The Ministry of WA Affairs has seen new faces writing IFVs this term, but we can do more by eventually encouraging our staffers to take on writing resolutions. Repeals are usually easier to write than new resolutions, so writing one of them can be a staffer’s point of entry into writing full resolutions.

Cards

Season 4 is now upon us, and we need the Cards Guild to come up with solutions on how to sustainably replenish our card stocks, which are being depleted for Keeper of the North awards. I will appoint a new and active Cards Guildmaster and work with them to fulfill our goals.

Technology

The WADP was successfully revived thanks to @Kaschovia's efforts, giving us a major tool to promote and encourage endorsements on the Delegate. However, with Sarovia having threatened us, it is critical that the Civil Defense Siren and Retaliatory Recruitment are revived to stop them from attempting to recruit from us, if they try. It would also be excellent to have them as tools to respond to poaching attempts or recruitment bombing, as we have suffered lately from Christian regions. I discussed with some of our Tech Guild members on the possibility of reviving them, and I was pleased to be informed that setting them up again is entirely possible.

Maintaining WA endorsement levels

Since I am the sitting Delegate, no transition will be needed if I am re-elected. I have noticed the recent drop in my endorsements as F/S continues to bleed us, and I am prepared to conduct regular RMB pings and telegram campaigns to halt the bleeding. I will work closely with the Vice Delegate on this matter to coordinate our efforts and maximise efficiency.

Vice Delegate Sil Dorsett has mentioned how the number of our WAs are dropping overall, not just our endorsements. It is therefore essential to conduct campaigns and induce new nations to join the WA, whether by telegrams, dispatches, or additional awards. I will discuss our options and work together with the next Vice Delegate if re-elected.

That was quite long, but the bottom line is, I am doing my best to improve TNP step by step, to bring us out of this stupor and revive our community, and I ask that you place your faith in me once more. Despite the manpower shortage and inactivity problems plaguing us, all Ministries are still operating and producing output as opposed to one or some dying completely, which is a testament to my administration’s commitment and dedication despite the hardship we are going through. My leadership style may not make me very visible to the public, but it has served the government as well as it can be in these times. The challenges we face may seem daunting to overcome, but I believe that by working together, we can get through this, and prosper.

P.S. I will rework my campaign thread with some graphics as soon as possible. I won't let you miss out on my campaign graphics! I may also include additional ideas and policies here if I believe they would be good to implement.
 
Last edited:
I have to wonder, when reading this, whether you're running as an incumbent or a challenger, because your platform and your record don't match up. So first, some questions:

Not only am I active
Your lack of public activity has been noted multiple times on Discord - by what measure, with this in mind, would you say you are active?
This problem can be directly attributed to the moribund Officer’s Corps, which lacks interest and energy to lead operations and energise the soldiers with regular training. Management and leadership continue to fall disproportionately on the shoulders of the NPA High Command, who often have additional duties and obligations in other areas (like Colonels Caius and Kaschovia who are both Ministers), and the Minister of Defense. This is by no means sustainable, and the war against the Brotherhood of Malice can not be won with a declining NPA. It is therefore my opinion that we must return to the basics of focusing inwards and rebuilding our military before taking on large offensive operations against our enemies.
Given your history as Minister of Defense and in the NPA as a whole, do you feel any responsibility for this? And if so, why has nothing been done to address this over the last four months? In your last campaign, on this subject, you said this:
Another principal focus during my term as MoD is the training of new recruits and mentorship of promising Sergeants into capable Lieutenants. The old Instructor program, where a new soldier or a Warrant Officer is paired with an experienced officer to guide them, was revived for this exact purpose. I myself have taken on a few mentees to teach them the ways of R/D operations. To make our knowledge more permanently ingrained, I wrote down a new Soldier’s Manual - with the assistance of High Command and other officers - covering all basic R/D operations, assistance tools, and best practices for a new soldier.

Unfortunately, High Command has suffered from a loss of experience and activity as some of our Generals have resigned. As Delegate, my goals are to complete the Officer’s Manual and train our Warrant Officers to become full-fledged Lieutenants, paving the way for them to serve as future Colonels or perhaps even Generals/MoDs. I do not want High Command to be plagued by inactivity as our best people continue to burn out, and so I will pay keen attention to this area and make it clear to my Minister of Defense that this should be their top priority as well.
So back in September High Command was the problem and as MoD you revived or instituted programs to help bulk out the officer corps to help out the High Command. Four months later and you're saying that very same officer corps is what's causing the NPA's decline. With this in mind, would you say that over the last four months, you have failed in your goals for the NPA? And if so, why should the region trust this new focus?
Thus, if we want to boost our numbers next term, the Auxiliary should be advertised to the region via gameside recruitment and engagement, in various forms like telegrams, dispatches, and RMB interactions, as a low-effort, low-barrier-to-entry alternative to the Special Forces, and likewise for the Militia for gameside residents without a forum or Discord account. If we can successfully encourage and foster a culture where residents sign up for the NPA or the Militia as part of their service to the region, much like obtaining citizenship or joining a Ministry, then our numbers problem can be greatly alleviated. Doubly so for our activity troubles if, during their Auxiliary service, our soldiers discover a taste for the exciting and glamorous operations of the Special Forces, and eagerly commit themselves as new updaters.
Why hasn't this already been happening?
The Ministry of Culture has suffered greatly from a shortage of active and available manpower to organise and host events this term. My first priority next term, therefore, is to contact players who are active and have experience in this area and ask them to host events regularly.
Why has this not been happening already? I could probably guess, given that earlier in your platform you say this:
This leadership style, I have found, suits my needs and restrictions best. Direct involvement, or a hands-on approach, can be great for activity from an outside glance, but people who adopt this approach tend to end up burned out or focusing on one or two Ministries at a time only, while the rest are neglected and left to wither. Myself, I have discovered to my dismay that spending time to complete tasks in one Ministry usually distracted me from other affairs or left responses delayed. That’s hardly surprising: the workload of the Delegate is massive. Not only are you managing all six Ministries under your command, each with their own burden of tasks, but you also have to vote on WA resolutions and endotart daily, work on regional security with the Security Council and the NPA’s High Command, solve difficult Foreign Affairs questions with allies and enemies, maintain communication with the Regional Assembly, and generally attend to regional affairs at a strategic level. It is practically impossible (and unsustainable) for one person to tackle all the mundane Ministerial tasks and high-level matters at the same time, and harder still to maintain consistent activity like that for a full term. Therefore, the best approach, in my view, is to regularly collaborate and coordinate with your Ministers to fulfill specific goals and address urgent problems, to maintain a consistent level of activity and achieve the best results possible in line with your agenda and existing limited resources across all Ministries. Spreading yourself out trying to save every failing Ministry and nurse it back to vibrant activity is impractical, and the end results will generally make you feel disappointed, demoralised and unable to get anything done while the government continues to fail.
Manpower issues in ministries and a lack of care and attention being paid by the Delegate to solve them isn't something you can dismiss with a "well I can't be everywhere". As Delegate, if you see a problem in a ministry, it's your job to try and solve it, by working with the Minister to help them. That would be truly collaborative leadership.
I suspect that our switch has jumpstarted the NatSov movement within the GA, with recent passed proposals being mostly repeals.
Given that the NatSov movement was already moving forward prior to your election, this feels more like arrogance than an accurate statement.
That was quite long, but the bottom line is, I am doing my best to improve TNP step by step, to bring us out of this stupor and revive our community, and I ask that you place your faith in me once more. Despite the manpower shortage and inactivity problems plaguing us, all Ministries are still operating and producing output as opposed to one or some dying completely, which is a testament to my administration’s commitment and dedication despite the hardship we are going through. My leadership style may not make me very visible to the public, but it has served the government as well as it can be in these times. The challenges we face may seem daunting to overcome, but I believe that by working together, we can get through this, and prosper.
Sorry but from the outside looking in, all your leadership style does is make you look inactive to the public - and the picture you paint of manpower shortages and inactivity problems are things you have had four months solve and haven't done so. So why should anyone trust that you can solve them over the next four months?

And speaking of the last four months, let's go back and look at your platform from September and see how you've done. We've briefly looked at Defence already but there was another part of that section of your platform, which I'll repost below:
Under my term, the High Command has explored and tried many avenues for recruitment: promotion of our victories through dispatches and forum posts, telegrams, RMB recruitment, private outreach to interested parties, etc. New ribbons were also exquisitely designed and handed out to raise our soldiers’ morale and attract outside interest.

Going forward, I’d like to see the NPA making an upgrade from routine operations reports to its own monthly publication/magazine that acts both as a summary of its operations and an advertisement of its image to the wider region. In addition, weekly telegram recruitment runs can be organised by Home Affairs to bring in new soldiers and increase our updater/auxiliary capacity for grand offensives/liberations. I will also make full use of the Gameside Advocates to heavily promote NPA dispatches, reports, and publications on the RMB. Although 9003’s RMB bot is effective at regularly putting out messages, I feel like its repetitive posts lack the human touch that makes recruitment more personalised and appealing to the average player. Medals, ribbons, leaderboards, and other awards will continue to be explored and designed to give our soldiers additional motivation to participate.

Last but not least, I’d like to see a modernised rendition of the old Call to Serve program. The basic idea is to interview High Command generals (or even some long-serving officers) and have them tell their stories in the NPA to inspire others to enlist. The format could either be an NBS Radio interview or a text-based one. The key is to attract listeners and encourage them to join the NPA through exciting tales of adventures or heroics in our army.
None of this appears to have happened, at least not to the extent needed to prevent you from describing the NPA as declining. Given that none of your goals for the NPA were achieved this term, where do you think things went wrong?

You gave moderate goals for Foreign Affairs and you hit half of them, which in modern times is a passing grade. However, you also went through three Ministers of Foreign Affairs, one of whom resigned in disgrace and another who is standing against you and seems to dispute a number of things you've said about how the last term went. To review:
Our Foreign Affairs situation is quite advantageous: we currently enjoy a wide and diverse coalition of regions which despise the BoM + TCB sphere for their constant provocations and attacks. This anti-BoM “Grand Alliance” has enabled us to dominate the WA and advance our interests there without much opposition: libjuncts to save regions raided by our enemies are widely passed, while resolutions authored by or C/Cs rewarded to them are routinely repealed. Our MGC sanctions continue to be strictly enforced with substantial effects: the implosion and collapse of Astoria, a former BoM-allied region, was caused by internal disputes relating to its participation on the side of BoM during their war against us and the sanctions’ suffocating restrictions on its FA outreach. Despite raider boasts that the sanctions are ineffective, cracks have begun to appear and demonstrate that military victories on the field don’t necessarily translate to firm and unyielding unity.

My aims are to maintain our anti-BoM alliance, which would require pragmatism and compromise. I and the FA Ministry would work with our allies to keep us focused on our common interests of fighting BoM as opposed to distracting ideological fights. Furthermore, we would expand our network of friends, embassy regions, and informal partners, not only for cultural collaboration but also for potential military cooperation and further isolating the BoM + TCB circle. Every region we can court is like a small brick, the more bricks we can collect and we will eventually build a wall (*sigh*) surrounding our enemies. We need to continuously apply pressure on them via sanctions and repeals of their C/Cs as well.

Internally, I would like to build upon one of Comfed’s old projects: case studies for our FA staffers and analysts. Academic exercises to train our staffers on FA knowledge is a good idea, and we can take some historical NS events (coups, wars, invasions, etc.) to test our analysts on what they will do as leaders in those situations. It would be a learning experience, one that could pay off later down the road. The most promising staffers can be offered a spot on the Committee of Foreign Relations: as its most junior member without any significant FA experience prior to my appointment, I have found being on the Committee to be one of my most enriching experiences. Our Ambassadors, on the other hand, will continue to promptly post our news publications and FA updates to other regions when requested.
The last part of that does not appear to have happened and whilst you decry Ambassadors today as "glorified couriers" you seemed to have no problem back in September with them playing that role. What changed and why was Comfed's old project not pursued?

Next, communications, where we hit some familiar themes:
Addressing the manpower issue

There’s no sugarcoating it: The Ministry is in a sorry state due to a shortage of capable writers and designers. Our publications’ publishing schedule frequently faces delays due to our existing writers being occupied with significant commitments elsewhere. To alleviate this problem, we must bolster our recruitment via weekly or biweekly promotions and telegram recruitments for the Ministry; advertisement posters and infographics; and outreach efforts to people who are interested in writing or designing. We can also invite people from outside TNP to contribute to our publications in the form of news reports or opinion pieces, offering all of us some much-needed fresh content.

Retention of morale

Speaking from experience, writing an article with a deadline is seriously hard work, especially if you have other RL or NS commitments as well. Not only must you properly research the facts before writing, you must also choose their words carefully to fit the professional tone of the publication (even with the Editors’ assistance), and sometimes the well of creativity can run dry or you are simply frustrated with your word choice/grammar/paragraph structure. As Deputy Minister of Communications and author of several articles, I have felt that deeply. If we want to keep our writers to continue their work, we can reinstitute our old Comms awards program or even offer Legendary cards as reward for an article written or an issue designed. An end-of-month award or end-of-term Best [category] Contest are also good ways to maintain morale.

A new direction for TNL

The Northern Lights, our flagship publication, has remained in a state of limbo for months. With the manpower issue plaguing the Ministry, it is very difficult to produce TNS and TNL regularly at the same time. One of my ideas as Deputy Minister was to reform TNL into an end-of-term special: Instead of making TNS issues for the final months of a term like April, August, and December, we can replace them with TNL issues instead. The production of TNL will be less frequent (at a rate of 3 issues a year), but its exclusivity, quality, and design will be its main selling point to readers.
Spoiler: Culture: Fun games and exciting festivals
Low manpower, poor morale and a goal for The Northern Lights that was not hit. Given that your plans for Communications in this platform are broadly the same, would you say that you completely and utterly failed over the last four months with regards to Communications? If so, why?

Your culture platform was as unambitious as it was short. Here's what it said:
Successful culture events must invite the engagement of the community. Without community engagement, there can simply be no events. I have noticed that the events with the best engagement are usually chess tournaments, voice chats, and interactive games. All of these will be hosted regularly on our Discord, and a special role can be created to ping interested people to join as participants. Another idea that is going to be explored is trivia nights: trivia competitions with a human host and an award for the winner at the end, which could be really fun and engaging as opposed to playing with a bot.

But we can go bigger than that. As Delegate, I would like to replicate the Pride Prom’s success by organising great festivals with our MGC and PPO allies. Chess tournaments with TWP, LGBT-themed events with Europeia, the possibilities are endless.
None of this happened. You've blamed a manpower issue. You've also indicated that your approach to leadership means you take a hands-off approach when a ministry is failing. Would you say your leadership style has contributed to the failure to hit your targets in both Communications and Culture?
Home Affairs is arguably the most important Ministry to our region’s health: its recruitment and integration of new arrivals are critical to producing new talent for our community and replacing losses from burnout. Yet the Ministry’s neglected state has saddened me greatly. Recruitment and mentorship may be tedious, but their purposes are vital. Going into the next term, I will appoint a strong and active hand to lead the Ministry and restore it to regular activity so that it can fulfill my ambitious goals for recruitment and mentorship.

Despite the Ministry’s inactivity, our manual recruitment efforts have been great this term thanks to the tireless dedication of Petronellania, who has been duly recognised with a Delegate’s Service Award. However, I do not want Petro to carry the Ministry’s recruitment alone. All recruiters will be regularly pinged and reminded to do their work, and badges or cards will be awarded to the most active ones.

Mentorships will be operated in a similar manner: those who mentor the most newcomers will be recognised and rewarded with shiny badges or cards based on the number of mentees taken. I plan to revive the old Points Project which used to keep track of the number of recruitment telegrams sent and mentees claimed to reward staffers.

Resource Review was, and still is, one of my main passions as a staffer and Deputy Minister. I love designing new banners and graphics to beautify our dispatches, and currently I maintain like ten or so government dispatches on my main nation. Nevertheless, I hope to entice some designers to join HA so that the workload can be distributed more evenly and progress can be made faster on this front.
This is a success you should talk about more. Home Affairs has seemingly revived during your delegacy. Well done. Why do you think you succeeded here whilst other internal ministries have failed under your watch?

On MoWAA you said this:
While I’m not involved in WA Affairs, I’m satisfied with its performance from an outside look. The efforts of our tech people and prolific WA authors have ensured that IFVs continue to be sent like clockwork, while our resolutions dominate the GA. One of its projects that I want to prioritise as Delegate is passing SC Commends for some of our most distinguished regionmates. In effect, I will look into reviving or salvaging the defunct Heroes of Valhalla program and continue its work.

To further our MGC sanctions, we must continue to repeal our enemies’ resolutions, whether it be GA ones or C/Cs of their regions/players. Under my direction, the MoWAA will pursue this path to its fullest extent in cooperation with our allies.
Another short platform but one with multiple goals - goals that don't really seem to have been hit outside of MGC Sanctions-related ones, which I think you recognise in your platform this time around. What will you do differently to ensure the Ministry hits your goals if re-elected?

On Radio you said this:
Although I support having a separate Ministry of Radio on principle, I do not believe it can survive in its current state. Having the Delegate and the Minister as the main two people running the show is simply unsustainable, and I will fold the Ministry of Radio back under Communications’s portfolio until we get additional manpower to justify forming a separate Ministry.

Unfortunately, I can’t host frequent town halls due to my work schedule, but I can make Fireside Chats as a substitute. Bringing back an old program under former Delegate Pallaith, I will make radio addresses to TNPers discussing affairs in our region or answering your submitted questions. I think this can be a good way to connect with our citizens and inform them of various events.

Interviews and roundtable sessions will be regularly organised and hosted to bring us additional content.
Have any of these happened? If not, why not?

You noted the poor state of our technology and the cards program:
One of the things I haven’t talked about is the broken state of our technology. We have a Tech Guild of the best tech-minded players and admins to repair it, yet I feel its efforts have yet to be fully realised due to a lack of centralised management. Although I’m not a tech person, I will work with the Admin team and Tech Guild to see which projects can be completed or what problems need to be fixed.

Our Cards program is in a terrible state as well, and while I’m not a card farmer, I am receptive to reforms in this area to revitalise it. A Cards Working Group has been formed thanks to Dreadton’s efforts and I trust his reforms will help us bring some activity back into Cards. I will try my best to assist him in doing so.
In your platform for this election you praise the revival of the WADP. In September you inquired as to the status of a number of other projects but never followed up publicly. What happened and how closely have you worked with admin and our tech-minded players to repair our tech?

Our Cards program does not seem to have improved over the last four months and you say you'll appoint a "new and active guildmaster" - if the current incumbent is inactivity, why haven't you already acted? Why is this a platform goal when you have the power to address the issue today, immediately?

Overall, I don't find your record enough to convince me that you can achieve the goals you've laid out in this platform and I have to question whether your style of leadership is conductive to good governance in the region.
 
This is getting overly long, so I'm splitting my answer into two parts.
I have to wonder, when reading this, whether you're running as an incumbent or a challenger, because your platform and your record don't match up. So first, some questions:

Your lack of public activity has been noted multiple times on Discord - by what measure, with this in mind, would you say you are active?
Searching for my messages in our Discord server alone, I was posting almost daily across government channels, as well as public and citizen-only ones like #real-life, #the-agora, #citizen-chat and #regional-assembly-private, albeit scattered. I don't know where this notion that I'm inactive on Discord came from. On a higher level, I have authored a TNN article, a TNS article, and helped in its publication. I have also engaged our gameside residents on the RMB, not daily but still quite active and present nonetheless.

And this is just public engagement. Behind the scenes, I have discussed regularly with my Ministers on our current progress, problems and bottlenecks that need to be solved, and solutions to those problems. I pretty much co-manage The North Star with Minister Kaschovia. A lot of my time was also spent devoted to our Foreign Affairs, and I was deeply involved in the discussions and shifts surrounding our FA direction.

So I do not believe that I am "inactive" by any means.
Given your history as Minister of Defense and in the NPA as a whole, do you feel any responsibility for this? And if so, why has nothing been done to address this over the last four months? In your last campaign, on this subject, you said this:

So back in September High Command was the problem and as MoD you revived or instituted programs to help bulk out the officer corps to help out the High Command. Four months later and you're saying that very same officer corps is what's causing the NPA's decline. With this in mind, would you say that over the last four months, you have failed in your goals for the NPA? And if so, why should the region trust this new focus?
Given that I was operating practically alone most of the time as Minister of Defense with zero support from the Delegate at the time, I believe that I did my best with then-existing resource and time constraints. Prior to the elevation of Cosmic and Caius to officers, almost all of the NPA's training and invading operations during last summer was led by myself. High Command also lost some experienced Generals due to retirements, making its capacity even smaller. I knew from the start that this could not continue indefinitely, which was why I strove to host regular operations, identify talented up-and-coming soldiers (like Cosmic and Caius), and mentor them into new officers in the hopes that they would lead the new generation. When I was elected Delegate, both of them became Ministers. Cosmic led the NPA as best as they could with my support and guidance, while Caius concentrated on his duties in Home Affairs. It is unfortunate that Cosmic did not have the same luck as I did in finding new talent to become officers and keep up the NPA's activity, but you can't do that at the drop of a hat.

Building a new generation of active and aggressive officers to lead the NPA is a long-term project. It requires our existing officers to take up their responsibility to lead and mentor the next generation, and soldiers to commit to consistent service. To accomplish those two things, it demands a significant investment of time and effort by the MoD and High Command into incentives that attract them, whether it be cards, ribbons, games, awards, etc. and regular operations that get their energy running. The work that I have laid down as Minister of Defense, and later as Delegate is just the beginning. I consider the lack of substantial progress this term to be a setback, not a failure. Failure would be to give up and let the NPA collapse entirely.

Our officers currently lack interest in organising and leading ops. The region in general also has low interest in military service, and new soldiers seldomly stick around for more than a couple operations despite the promise of promotions, cards and ribbons. My new focus concentrates on proven things that excite our soldiers and maintain their interest in continued service.
Why hasn't this already been happening?
Our focus this term has mainly been investment in joint operations and recruitment via advertising our victories. It was quite glamorous, but not simple for newcomers. More steps can be taken to make military service more accessible for gameside residents.
Why has this not been happening already? I could probably guess, given that earlier in your platform you say this:

Manpower issues in ministries and a lack of care and attention being paid by the Delegate to solve them isn't something you can dismiss with a "well I can't be everywhere". As Delegate, if you see a problem in a ministry, it's your job to try and solve it, by working with the Minister to help them. That would be truly collaborative leadership.
I did communicate and discuss problems and challenges regularly with my Ministers, and provide solutions that can address them. What I think is impossible and impractical is taking up the tasks of every Ministry in a vain effort to save all of them and provide a façade of activity before you inevitably burn out in quick order: host a game night on Monday, write an article on Tuesday, send recruitment telegrams on Wednesday, participate in confidential negotiations on Thursday, publish an IFV on Friday, that kind of hands-on approach. As an example, Simone's hands-on approach with Comms and Culture resulted in his posting Discord minipolls and weekly TNN articles while the rest of the Ministries, particularly Home Affairs, suffered. I could have posted polls and weekly articles at the expense of our Foreign Affairs and Defense Ministries, but I prioritised a collaborative approach.

Given that the NatSov movement was already moving forward prior to your election, this feels more like arrogance than an accurate statement.

Sorry but from the outside looking in, all your leadership style does is make you look inactive to the public - and the picture you paint of manpower shortages and inactivity problems are things you have had four months solve and haven't done so. So why should anyone trust that you can solve them over the next four months?
I have not been "inactive" to the public, I explicitly dispute that notion. I have an active presence on Discord and the RMB, and within the government I have maintained daily activity. We have attempted to address the manpower shortage with regular recruitment runs, Discord pings, and the automatic RMB welcome bot which provides a pipeline to recruitment via the GAs, but they have produced low returns.

And speaking of the last four months, let's go back and look at your platform from September and see how you've done. We've briefly looked at Defence already but there was another part of that section of your platform, which I'll repost below:

None of this appears to have happened, at least not to the extent needed to prevent you from describing the NPA as declining. Given that none of your goals for the NPA were achieved this term, where do you think things went wrong?
First of all, the weekly recruitment runs in Home Affairs did happen. This term, prioritisation was given to maintaining a consistent tempo of operations and publishing gameside reports. There were efforts at rejuvenating internal activity with R/D contests, but they were unfinished due to our Chief of Staff going inactive before resigning.
You gave moderate goals for Foreign Affairs and you hit half of them, which in modern times is a passing grade. However, you also went through three Ministers of Foreign Affairs, one of whom resigned in disgrace and another who is standing against you and seems to dispute a number of things you've said about how the last term went. To review:
I believe I have a better than "passing grade" for Foreign Affairs. We have made new friends, signed a new treaty, and acquired a new friendly GCR (the Outback). The Plains of Perdition is also friendly to us. Our network of friends and partners have been greatly expanded this term. Chipoli resigned because of his inactivity, and Hulldom resigned because he committed espionage.
The last part of that does not appear to have happened and whilst you decry Ambassadors today as "glorified couriers" you seemed to have no problem back in September with them playing that role. What changed and why was Comfed's old project not pursued?
The Ambassador Corps has become inactive and I want to reform it into something better. The case studies project hit a dead end because there was no one to pursue it except one Deputy whose efforts were unable to bring it to completion. Not even Chipoli helped said Deputy with it. I had little knowledge of diplomatic history so I was unable to render help, and given that there was little interest within the Ministry in pursuing this, including Comfed himself when he was reappointed, I decided to change my focus to reforming the Ambassador Corps.
Next, communications, where we hit some familiar themes:

Low manpower, poor morale and a goal for The Northern Lights that was not hit. Given that your plans for Communications in this platform are broadly the same, would you say that you completely and utterly failed over the last four months with regards to Communications? If so, why?
"Completely and utterly failed" is incorrect. Despite Communications having a severe shortage right now, it still manages to produce TNS and TNN publications. NBS broadcasts were planned, but due to time constraints they were unable to be completed. I helped wherever I could, I functionally co-manage The North Star with Kaschovia.
Your culture platform was as unambitious as it was short. Here's what it said:

None of this happened. You've blamed a manpower issue. You've also indicated that your approach to leadership means you take a hands-off approach when a ministry is failing. Would you say your leadership style has contributed to the failure to hit your targets in both Communications and Culture?
Sure, I could have posted more polls and minigames, but I found that doing so would have distracted myself from strategic affairs at a time when the state of gameplay is relatively turbulent. I have given a great deal of attention towards our foreign affairs and navigated our region through crises and new developments. I found that I could not be hands-on in both Comms & Culture while leaving our FA direction completely aimless, and so I prioritised the latter.
This is a success you should talk about more. Home Affairs has seemingly revived during your delegacy. Well done. Why do you think you succeeded here whilst other internal ministries have failed under your watch?
Regular recruitment runs were managed by the tireless Deputy Minister Petronellania. Minister Caius also helped with recruitment and mentorship lists. Resource Review was mostly managed by myself, I took it upon me to update dispatches and send the code to Sil to update them on TNL (the nation).

(Continued later)
 
It is now two days since you noted that you'd continue replies to my question later, which I think demonstrates the lack of activity better than anything I could have said.
 
Last edited:
The second part of my answer, I apologise for my lateness.
On MoWAA you said this:

Another short platform but one with multiple goals - goals that don't really seem to have been hit outside of MGC Sanctions-related ones, which I think you recognise in your platform this time around. What will you do differently to ensure the Ministry hits your goals if re-elected?
I have been in contact with our WAA Minister on the progress of our Commends. Currently there are two Commendation drafts in the works, Commend Siwale and Commend Kaschovia. The former is near completion for forum drafting while the latter is in research stage. A list of proposal ideas was given to staffers but few has taken up writing. To address this, I have discussed with my WAA Minister on setting up a reward system next term for completing resolutions and IFVs to encourage our staffers.
On Radio you said this:

Have any of these happened? If not, why not?
Radio programs have been planned but due to time and manpower constraints, they were unable to be produced. I was preparing my first Fireside Chat script shortly before the unfortunate Kodiak raid, the fallout of which disrupted my work and prevented me from finishing it.
You noted the poor state of our technology and the cards program:

In your platform for this election you praise the revival of the WADP. In September you inquired as to the status of a number of other projects but never followed up publicly. What happened and how closely have you worked with admin and our tech-minded players to repair our tech?
Outside of the WADP, the daily Cards Lottery for Keepers of the North has also been revived and is operating smoothly on the RMB. I was informed that the endorsement tool was not an active project, while the Civil Defense Siren and Retaliatory Recruitment were functionally complete in coding but there were difficulties with finding a server to host them on.
Our Cards program does not seem to have improved over the last four months and you say you'll appoint a "new and active guildmaster" - if the current incumbent is inactivity, why haven't you already acted? Why is this a platform goal when you have the power to address the issue today, immediately?
The main difficulty with our Cards program is that there aren't many active Cards Guild members left. Most of our long-time, experienced and active members have departed or fallen into inactivity. The remaining ones in government either operate a separate Cards program in other regions or are occupied with other government duties. Fortunately, in the end I was able to find a suitable replacement, who has stated that they would be interested in running our Cards program next term as Guildmaster.
Overall, I don't find your record enough to convince me that you can achieve the goals you've laid out in this platform and I have to question whether your style of leadership is conductive to good governance in the region.
I disagree. Taking into account the existing resource and manpower constraints, as well as my own availability, I faced a difficult choice. Either I could be hands-on with public-facing initiatives (such as events, polls, and news articles) at the expense of internal government activity and direction in Foreign Affairs, Defense and Home Affairs, or I could maintain a generally collaborative management approach to keep all Ministries running and prioritise the three aforementioned Ministries during a time of constant shifts in global geopolitics. I chose the latter, and I believe that is closer to good governance for our region.
 
I have come up with a campaign banner and a supporter badge for your perusal. Thank you all for your patience, if you would like to support my campaign then you can put this in your signature.

kk61PBz.png
 
Hey Picairn,

Firstly, I have to somewhat agree with MJs opening comment, reading your campaign here, it doesn't read like the campaign of an incumbent coming off of a successful first term, rather a challenger pointing out the issues in a struggling Government and how they plan on fixing it. Therefore, I just have some questions of most of the areas of your Government that I was hoping you could comment on further.

Defence
On Defence, one of my big concerns that is that you are putting forward a commitment to do at least 1 training op per week. This just isn't going to be enough. I do appreciate that the appetite isn't there from the officers corps and leadership, but 1 op per week just isn't going to be enough to get newer soldiers hooked and trained to move through the ranks and re-build the NPA. On top of this, setting the bar at 1 training op per week also means that for people that are only available at either a Major or a Minor update, they are potentially going to have to wait weeks in order to take part in an operation that is suitable for their timezone, thus setting them further back, and discouraging them from getting involved. Therefore, while I acknowledge that there is some level of burnout from the Officer corps, I want to ask why you are setting the bar so low in terms of the frequency of training ops?

My other big concern about your campaign on the NPA is your comment about the 'the rot in our military has spread from the top to the bottom'. Firstly, I feel that this comment isn't going to sit right with a lot of the NPA, and risks further discouraging the officers corps from wanting to help out as it suggests that they do not feel valued by their superiors. Therefore, I want to ask whether you feel that comments such as this are conducive to an environment within the NPA that is going to encourage the officer corps to get involved.

But more importantly, if the rot has spread from the top to the bottom, as the incumbent, what have been doing about it for the last term? As the incumbent Delegate and a former MoD, do you not bare some responsibility for allowing this rot to spread?

Foreign affairs
I think we can all agree that developing stronger ties with the sinkers is a good think and will be beneficial to us. Now I know that you won't want to reveal your entire hand on how you want to go about developing this relationship, but please can you expand on how you plan going about developing this stronger bond with these regions and how successful you expect this to be?

On pragmatism and inclusion, you speak about pursuing relations with other regions for mutually beneficial cooperation, so I just wanted to clarify, does this mean that we can expect to see new allies and relations forming over this term, and what sort of region are we to expect to see relations being develop with, as I am sure you already have some idea of what this pursuit will look like? As well as this, what areas of mutually beneficial cooperation are most important to the Government, and to our growth?

On submitting regular reports, ambassador reports are not a new idea, but in the past were never very regular or consistent in their approach, so what is going to be different this time to make this more successful than previous iterations of this idea/

On having a small, more qualifies crop of ambassadors, what is your Minister and Ministry going to do to ensure that this small crop doesn't block progression and development for newcomers, while also preventing these ambassadors from suffering with burnout as they would be required to pick up more work in this smaller team?

Culture
On your plans to solve the manpower issue, you speak about directly contacting active players, rather than just focusing on the internal manpower of the Ministry. Are you not concerned that this could result in the Ministry becoming reliant on outside citizens to carry out these cultural activities, rather than building on the activity from within the Ministry?

You also talk about wanting to encourage new and exciting gameside events, therefore, please can you expand a little on this and talk about what sort of new and exciting events we should be expecting.

On festivals, you said that your Culture Ministry would be open to organising a festival, does this mean that we should expect one to occur at some point in this term, or just that the possibility is there?

You also state that gameside polls are not difficult to post regularly, but if that is the case, then why were they stopped? If they aren't difficult to post regularly, then surely manpower shouldn't be that much of an issue?

Communications
You say that you want publications to focus on quality over quantity, but is that not how it has always been for this Ministry? You say that the Ministry should not put out low-effort, poorly executed slop, but I don't think that the Ministry ever has, so wouldn't it be fair to say that the Comms focus has always been on quality over quantity?

On the issue of guest writers, I do agree that this can be a good idea as long as they are done sparely to prevent the Ministry becoming reliant on them. Therefore, what will you do to ensure that the Ministry doesn't become too reliant on guest writers to get publications completed?

Home Affairs
You say in your campaign that you plan to make more use of GAs, so please can you tell us how you plan on doing this, and what sort of roles and responsibilities you plan on giving the GAs this term?

On mentor lists, you've said that they became inconsistent in your last term. Why did they become inconsistent, and what are you going to do differently with them this term so that this doesn't happen again?
 
Picairn, these four months have been very taxing and difficult, even for basic NS standards given the reality of the post-F/S world. I knew you’d have your work cut out for you, and it’s no secret that I felt you needed more time to prepare and be ready for this job when you sought it last election. I think it’s fair to say you’ve acquitted yourself well in a variety of areas and have struggled in others. And you had the bad luck of being tested a bit more than some other recent delegates. But that’s how this goes, it’s a roll of the dice and you just have to be as ready as possible, and face the challenges with as much courage and careful study as you can manage. For better or worse you’ve learned a lot and have four months of experience under your belt.

I feel that experience isn’t just about knowing things about the job or lists of things you’ve done before. Part of experience is learning from mistakes or discovering misconceptions you may have had about the role, reality that forced you to rethink plans or how to do the job. Can you give me some examples of things you felt you did poorly or learned a lesson from during this past term that will inform how you do this job again if you are re-elected? What did you realize you were mistaken about, what did you underestimate, what do you know how to do better now compared to when you started? If you were running against yourself for Delegate, what are the concerns or issues you would want to highlight and have yourself address or explain?

I believe that any delegate has to answer for the state of the region under their watch, no matter how much is directly attributed to your own decisions or mistakes, or your successes. And sometimes you just have a bad hand and have to play it out the best you can. If the region feels your best wasn’t good enough, then they will render their judgment. I have some insight as an advisor and can attest to the very rough “economy” of the game right now, but even I feel some of these critiques are fair and earned by the government’s performance. You cannot be an outside challenger to the system when your government is the system. And the buck stops with you, no matter how poorly you may feel your team performed or who did or did not back you up. You have explained that you prioritized certain areas over others and this was why you did not personally take some of these tasks on to make sure they happened even with the extensive staff shortage. You correctly observed that it’s not all you alone, and that burnout can follow if you take everything on yourself. But if the government doesn’t complete its tasks and fails to meet its goals, that’s ultimately your responsibility. I’d like another angel to your platform and your plans for the term ahead, one that shows which corrective action you’ll take if the next term is like the last one, and you continue to lack the manpower and activity in your ministries that would move us forward and keep the metaphorical lights on. What can you do personally and specifically to force these ministries to make progress on the things you want to do, assuming a worst case scenario? And do you feel these things could have been employed in the term that just ended?

I actually see a lot of similarities between your campaign and Chipoli’s, which suggests that you recognize the direction you previously charted for the region wasn’t working and needed to be corrected. I assume you’ll cover some of this in your other answers to my questions, but I’m curious why you felt some of these approaches needed to be changed, and what the biggest differences are in how you’d implement them vs Chipoli?
 
Hello Owen, my answers to your questions are below.
Hey Picairn,

Firstly, I have to somewhat agree with MJs opening comment, reading your campaign here, it doesn't read like the campaign of an incumbent coming off of a successful first term, rather a challenger pointing out the issues in a struggling Government and how they plan on fixing it. Therefore, I just have some questions of most of the areas of your Government that I was hoping you could comment on further.
I have heard this criticism about my campaign several times so I feel it needs to be addressed here. While I am the incumbent Delegate and my administration has accomplished many things this term, which I have listed, I will not shy away from acknowledging problems and issues where they exist, especially systemic ones like the manpower shortage the government is experiencing. The first step to fixing a problem, in my mind, is to recognise that it exists before identifying a solution. Recognising problems shouldn't be the sole purview of challengers, and it would not sit well with me personally to hide them. In addition, if an approach doesn't work out as intended anymore, it is my belief that change and adaptation will be needed instead of pursuing dead-ends.
Defence
On Defence, one of my big concerns that is that you are putting forward a commitment to do at least 1 training op per week. This just isn't going to be enough. I do appreciate that the appetite isn't there from the officers corps and leadership, but 1 op per week just isn't going to be enough to get newer soldiers hooked and trained to move through the ranks and re-build the NPA. On top of this, setting the bar at 1 training op per week also means that for people that are only available at either a Major or a Minor update, they are potentially going to have to wait weeks in order to take part in an operation that is suitable for their timezone, thus setting them further back, and discouraging them from getting involved. Therefore, while I acknowledge that there is some level of burnout from the Officer corps, I want to ask why you are setting the bar so low in terms of the frequency of training ops?
The commitment is meant as a floor, a basic milestone to be achieved. I certainly welcome and would do my best to get more training ops going for the NPA, but taking into account the current state of the officer corps and the capability of High Command (who are bearing the full responsibilities of management and leadership), I believe this commitment is a practicable goal. Since activity currently depends disproportionately on High Command's ability to lead frequently, it would be better, in my opinion, to phase out training operations in between large ones more consistently in order to keep regular activity going, as opposed to running High Command ragged and resulting in a fully inactive NPA.
My other big concern about your campaign on the NPA is your comment about the 'the rot in our military has spread from the top to the bottom'. Firstly, I feel that this comment isn't going to sit right with a lot of the NPA, and risks further discouraging the officers corps from wanting to help out as it suggests that they do not feel valued by their superiors. Therefore, I want to ask whether you feel that comments such as this are conducive to an environment within the NPA that is going to encourage the officer corps to get involved.
I understand your concerns about my comment, but I assure you that the NPA has a special place in my heart, which is why I am speaking about its problems and proposing solutions to address them. I have served as a soldier since October 2023, and during May - September 2024 I served as the NPA's Minister of Defense. In that capacity, I led and tagged along many operations with my fellow officers and soldiers, giving them advice and instructions on the way, and I was proud to see that my leadership style was received very positively.

The main reasons for officer inactivity, cited by the officers themselves, are usually real-life occupations, the logistics of setting up operations, or preference for a certain kind of operations only (such as occupational raiding where you raid and hold a region). The issues with morale and burnout can be addressed with rewards (like cards) or encouraging simpler, lower-effort operations (like detags) for officers and soldiers both. A good long-term solution would be to mentor and train new, active officers to lead the NPA, and that starts with regular ops.
But more importantly, if the rot has spread from the top to the bottom, as the incumbent, what have been doing about it for the last term? As the incumbent Delegate and a former MoD, do you not bare some responsibility for allowing this rot to spread?
I was MoD at a rough time in the NPA's history, when active and experienced High Command Generals were retiring and the Officer Corps started to become stagnant. The Delegate during that summer did not support or give me guidance on his military policy in any way, a grave failing that I vowed not to repeat if I was ever elected Delegate. Worse still, Home Affairs - the Ministry in charge of our recruitment - was left to wither during his term. Despite the fact that I was operating practically alone with a diminished High Command and no support from above, I still managed to get our operations running regularly each week, organise the capture of the Confederation of Corrupt Dictators with our allies, write a complete manual on basic R/D skills, and mentor two new officers, both of whom would become Ministers in my administration (one MoD, one MoHA). Looking back, I think I performed quite well despite the manpower and resource constraints at the time.

Since I was elected Delegate in September 2024, I made good on my vow and assisted my MoD every step of the way. We had an initial good run during the first month with much activity and recruitment generated from that, but soon it became apparent that elevating two officers was not enough to drive the entire NPA back into activity, particularly when one is occupied by his duties as MoHA. It is a long-term project, one that requires patience, investment and skill, to revitalise the inactive Officer Corps with fresh replacements.
Foreign affairs
I think we can all agree that developing stronger ties with the sinkers is a good think and will be beneficial to us. Now I know that you won't want to reveal your entire hand on how you want to go about developing this relationship, but please can you expand on how you plan going about developing this stronger bond with these regions and how successful you expect this to be?
We have already diplomatically recognised the new Sinkers and opened embassies with them. From there as they continue to develop and mature into stable communities, we have ample opportunities to collaborate with them in the World Assembly, in cultural exchanges, or common foreign affairs interests. Since both Sinkers are protected by our allies (and us for the Outback), I'm confident that they will be guaranteed the necessary peace and security to form a stronger bond with us through various initiatives over time.
On pragmatism and inclusion, you speak about pursuing relations with other regions for mutually beneficial cooperation, so I just wanted to clarify, does this mean that we can expect to see new allies and relations forming over this term, and what sort of region are we to expect to see relations being develop with, as I am sure you already have some idea of what this pursuit will look like? As well as this, what areas of mutually beneficial cooperation are most important to the Government, and to our growth?
Yes, we have recently signed a treaty with the AA and welcomed Talonia into the MGC, and I want to continue making new alliances and partnerships like that next term. Rising UCRs (Strongholds in particular) have potential for us to open new relations or develop existing ones with. We are already allied with almost all of the largest and strongest Frontiers (Carcassonne, Talonia, Europeia, Concord via The League), but there are rooms for more, provided that they are stable and secure.

The most important areas of mutual cooperation for the government right now is the World Assembly and counteraction (military and/or diplomatic) against BoM aggression. Cultural exchanges (like festivals) are underrated and I would like to see more of them next term. The geopolitical environment at present is quite favourable to our region as BoM continues to antagonise other regions and drives them to us. Their recent thorn against Ridgefield and the declaration that AA regions are "valid raid targets", which triggered a strong response from the AA and their allies, are a good example of this.
On submitting regular reports, ambassador reports are not a new idea, but in the past were never very regular or consistent in their approach, so what is going to be different this time to make this more successful than previous iterations of this idea/
The new process of applications and vetting is meant to address that problem. Through careful examination of our applicants' activity and reliability, we will gain a smaller but more reliable Ambassador Corps.
On having a small, more qualifies crop of ambassadors, what is your Minister and Ministry going to do to ensure that this small crop doesn't block progression and development for newcomers, while also preventing these ambassadors from suffering with burnout as they would be required to pick up more work in this smaller team?
The criteria for application will ensure that the Ministry, first and foremost, has an active and reliable corps of Ambassadors, and from there our Ambassadors can prove themselves further by gathering information and reporting on happenings within their posted regions. I'd also encourage them to post major events from their regions in the FA Analyst channel to foster further discussion. The reports don't need to be overly flowery or formatted, they are useful as long as the information presented is truthful and correct. I don't think it's a lot of work to deliver news and report events once or twice a month.
Culture
On your plans to solve the manpower issue, you speak about directly contacting active players, rather than just focusing on the internal manpower of the Ministry. Are you not concerned that this could result in the Ministry becoming reliant on outside citizens to carry out these cultural activities, rather than building on the activity from within the Ministry?
The internal manpower of the Ministry is rather small at the moment, and it is also quite inactive despite our pings. To solve the issue of inactive manpower will require the cooperation of active citizens to drive activity and encourage the rest to follow.
You also talk about wanting to encourage new and exciting gameside events, therefore, please can you expand a little on this and talk about what sort of new and exciting events we should be expecting.
Art, flag, poetry and song contests are good events that can be organised in both Discord and gameside. For more relaxed games, we can create crossword puzzles and give the winner an award, for example.
On festivals, you said that your Culture Ministry would be open to organising a festival, does this mean that we should expect one to occur at some point in this term, or just that the possibility is there?
I am committed to organise a festival next term. However, that may be impacted or delayed if we encounter logistical issues with our allied/partner region.
You also state that gameside polls are not difficult to post regularly, but if that is the case, then why were they stopped? If they aren't difficult to post regularly, then surely manpower shouldn't be that much of an issue?
Priority was given to movie and game nights this term while the organisation of regional polls fell by the wayside. I will refocus our Ministry on that starting next term.
Communications
You say that you want publications to focus on quality over quantity, but is that not how it has always been for this Ministry? You say that the Ministry should not put out low-effort, poorly executed slop, but I don't think that the Ministry ever has, so wouldn't it be fair to say that the Comms focus has always been on quality over quantity?
Comms is quite short-staffed right now, so to prioritise more frequent publication without a commensurate manpower increase means that we would have to sacrifice the quality of our reporting or design, or publish news of little import, and I don't want that.
On the issue of guest writers, I do agree that this can be a good idea as long as they are done sparely to prevent the Ministry becoming reliant on them. Therefore, what will you do to ensure that the Ministry doesn't become too reliant on guest writers to get publications completed?
Currently we are still relying on Ministry writers as the main authors for our articles. I don't intend on giving guest writers too outsized an influence in our publications, so a restriction of 1 guest article per issue, for example, wouldn't make us reliant on them.
Home Affairs
You say in your campaign that you plan to make more use of GAs, so please can you tell us how you plan on doing this, and what sort of roles and responsibilities you plan on giving the GAs this term?
Next term, I plan on integrating the GAs into MoHA and turn them into staffers to ensure a more uniformed approach to recruitment and mentorship for the Ministry. The GAs are our eyes and ears, our vital recruiters on the RMB who has promoted our dispatches and instructed newcomers to join our government staff or army when approached, but they having a separate space from the Ministry has prevented effective coordination at times. Joining as HA staffers mean that the Minister and their Deputies can ask them to work in wider recruitment and integration efforts beyond the RMB.
On mentor lists, you've said that they became inconsistent in your last term. Why did they become inconsistent, and what are you going to do differently with them this term so that this doesn't happen again?
The inconsistency happened as a result of the Deputy in charge of mentorship resigning, leaving it to the Minister to lead. He has posted mentor lists as regularly as possible, but having no Deputy in this area means that he couldn't delegate the responsibility when he was on leave/unable to work. I am working with him to find a suitable replacement in time for next term.
 
Picairn, your opponent spends a great deal of his platform talking about the lack of activity in the executive staff and how he wants to address it. Obviously, you also recognise that the problem exists, but you don't seem to have placed as much of a focus on it. Whatever obstacles you encountered this term (and I'm sure there were many), it's clear the situation hasn't improved and ultimately the responsibility has to rest with the Delegate, and since you are running for re-election, the citizens naturally want to see how you will tackle this pressing issue that you largely failed to make progress on in your term. Other than your individual plans for the ministries, how do you plan on reinvigorating and motivating the executive staff as a whole, and how will you work with your ministers to achieve that?

I won't ask any further about your track record as Delegate since many others have already done so, so I only have a few specific questions relating to your plans:

For FA, you have proposed producing FA Digests, much like Chipoli. These have both been tried before, so why has the MoFA struggled to produce publications similar to FA Digests previously?

Your WA section is very brief. Can you elaborate on how you intend to push for more commendations and resolutions being written? Especially in the current GA environment where authorship appears to be increasingly monopolised by a few people. What are your thoughts on the decline of activity in WALL, and do you plan on taking any action?

For Communications, do you think the current three-publication structure is viable? Given the lack of activity in the ministry, is it perhaps a good idea to combine them or get rid of the structure entirely to streamline the work and produce more frequent publications?

For Culture, what do you think is the reason behind the lack of manpower? Why doesn't hosting or organising events interest people, and what can you change about that?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top