Freedom of Information Request

[Blue Wolf II]

Hello! I am formally requesting from the Executive the release of all logs from the executive staff server relating to any discussion regarding the rejection of my two applications for a Foreign Affairs staff position that were submitted on 07AUG2024 and 20SEP2024 respectively.

The relevant legal section:

Spoiler: Section 7.4: Freedom of Information Act

27. For the purposes of this section "the government" refers to the Delegate and the Executive Officers, including the departments which they oversee, the Vice Delegate and Security Council, and the Speaker's office.
28. For the purposes of this section, “appropriate officers” are those officers responsible for the types of records being requested or released.
29. The Delegate and the designated officers of the Executive are responsible for records related to the Executive.
30. The Vice Delegate is responsible for records related to the Security Council.
31. The Speaker is responsible for records related to the Speaker's office.
32. For the purposes of this section, classified information is that which fits any of the below definitions:

• Real life information about any NationStates player from which there is a risk of inferring that player's real life identity and which has not willingly been disclosed to the public, including, but not limited to, an individual's name, IP address, physical address or location, phone number, place of employment or education, appearance, social media accounts, and other knowledge about a player, unless the player in question provides explicit consent for this information not to be considered private.
• Real life information about any NationStates player for which there exists a reasonable real life expectation of privacy or discretion, including, but not limited to, health status, both mental and physical; financial status; personal tragedies; changes in personal status such as marriage, divorce, pregnancy, birth, or death; and other similar information, unless the player in question provides explicit consent for this information not to be considered private.
• Information that, upon being made public, would jeopardize any ongoing military or intelligence operations; or jeopardize the security of units and agents participating in them, or be harmful to the diplomatic interests, military interests, or security of The North Pacific.
• Information that, upon being made public, would jeopardize Security Council operations in response to threats and attempted coups.

33. Notwithstanding any process for publication, any information which meets the criteria to be classified will not be released.
34. For the purposes of this section, "government records" are those which are kept on any platform utilized by the government and are open to members of the government and anyone assisting them.
35. For the purposes of this section, “private government records” are those which are kept on any platform utilized by the government and are restricted to only the Delegate, the designated officers of the Executive, and any other individuals granted access by the Delegate; only the Speaker, the Deputy Speakers, and any other individuals granted access by the Speaker; or only the Vice Delegate, the Security Council, and any other individuals granted access by the Vice Delegate.
36. Private government records which reach one year of age will be relocated to the appropriate Declassified Archive visible to residents.
37. At any time a resident may request the release of any government record or private government record through the appropriate officers.
38. The appropriate officers will retrieve information requested from the different departments of the government.
39. Residents who do not receive this information for any reason not specifically designated in appropriate laws or regulations may file a request for the information to the court, where the appropriate officers may present evidence that addresses any claim that release of the information meets one or more of the acceptable criteria for classification.
40. Information appropriately not disclosed will be accepted as classified by a majority vote of the Court sitting as a three-member panel.

 

[Chipoli]

Spoiler: Logs

Attempted Socialism — 08/08/2024 5:08 PM
Evil Wolf has applied to the MoFA (as well as other Ministries). I am hesitant in accepting it because of the implications, and I can't remember anyone else applying who has had such a prominent career in a different region. So my leaning is to reject the application but if I won't do so unilaterally.

Attempted Socialism — 08/09/2024 4:07 AM
Oh, Chipoli already rejected the application.
Nevermind then.

Simone — 08/09/2024 4:48 AM
‍:man_shrugging:

Chipoli — 08/09/2024 8:03 PM
No worries - thanks for the input nonetheless

Attempted Socialism — 09/25/2024 5:16 AM
We need a better answer for Blue Wolf at this point. Either that or talk with them about what our concerns are and what they want to do in the Ministry. Refusing every few months without any explanation will not look good.
https://forum.thenorthpacific.org/topic/7198621/123#post-10704320

Attempted Socialism — 10/07/2024 11:16 AM
As I said, we need a better answer to EW, or we need to talk with him about what he wants to do in the Ministry.
Because if we continue to deny his application without it, it does look like it's a far more dramatic thing than the banal concerns we discussed earlier.

All times are in EDT.

I would additionally like to address the applicant’s claims, made elsewhere, that he was not given a reason for his application's denial. Per our correspondence on August 10, over two months ago, the explanation given for the rejection was conflicting views with the region’s foreign policy and the potential for unconstructive conflict with members of the ministry’s staff.

 

[Blue Wolf II]

I would additionally like to address the applicant’s claims, made elsewhere, that he was not given a reason for his application's denial. Per our correspondence on August 10, over two months ago, the explanation given for the rejection was conflicting views with the region’s foreign policy and the potential for unconstructive conflict with members of the ministry’s staff.

What conflicts are you claiming? I don't know of any that you could reasonably be claiming.

Are you, perhaps, referring to the conversation we had were you accused me of being an LWU spy?