[GA, on hold] - Airspace Sovereignty Doctrine

Status
Not open for further replies.

Simone

Ursine thingy
-
-
-
-
Pronouns
It
TNP Nation
Simone_Republic
ga.jpg

Airspace Sovereignty Doctrine
Category: Regulation | Industry Affected: Transportation
Proposed by: Simone Republic, Co-authored by: Kenmoria | Onsite Topic


The World Assembly (WA),

Noting the repeals of resolutions concerning aircraft and airspace, such as GARs 342 and 464, and the legislative lacuna resultant therefrom;

Acknowledging the WA's long interest in outer space (via GARs 349, 451, 460, and 615) and travels therein; and

Desiring a common approach to defining what constitutes "airspace" and "outer space", in order to facilitate trade and travel between WA states;

The WA hereby enacts as follows:

  1. Definitions.
    • "Flying object" means anything defined by the International Aero-Space Administration (IASA) as (i) able to travel in "airspace" (defined below) and (ii) relying on its own power, but excludes any living flying creature.
    • "WA organs" means the WA’s sub-committees.
  2. Sovereignty.
    • Each WA state has and shall be deemed to have sovereignty over its own airspace.
    • "Airspace" is hereby defined as the atmosphere vertically over any land mass or any waters for which the said WA state claims sovereignty, up to the boundary where the exobase ends and barometric conditions no longer apply, and where outer space thereafter begins.
    • For WA states in celestial bodies with physical features (such as the lack of an atmosphere) that render the definition in subclause 2(b) inapplicable, the airspace of the said WA state is that space (which, for convenience, shall also be referred to herein as a WA state's "airspace") vertically over any land mass or any waters for which the said WA state claims sovereignty, either (whichever is lower):
      • Up to the point that allows the said WA state a height of airspace as enables it to conduct those activities that a technologically similar terrestrial WA state would be able to conduct, or
      • Up to the point where the gravitational pull of the celestial body on which that WA state resides becomes negligible for the domestic purposes of that WA state.
    • "Outer space" is hereby defined as any space (excluding airspace) between celestial bodies.
    • Airspace that is vertically over terra nullius, or that is over international waters where no state has asserted sovereignty, is hereby declared to be international airspace.
    • No WA state may assert sovereignty over outer space or international airspace, nor assist any state or non-state actor in asserting sovereignty over outer space or international airspace.
    • The extent of airspace as defined in subclauses 2(b) and 2(c) can be varied by valid treaties signed and ratified by all WA states that possess airspace affected by the said treaty.
  3. Jurisdiction.
    • A flying object registered to the competent authorities of a WA state is deemed to be under that WA state's jurisdiction, and that WA state is deemed the "flag state" of that flying object.
    • A flying object operated by, for, or on behalf of a WA organ is subject to the jurisdiction of the WA, and the WA itself is deemed the flag state of that flying object.
  4. Non-interference of WA flying objects.
    • A WA state must not impede the normal operations of any flying objects under the jurisdiction of the WA itself, except strictly for the purpose of:
      • capacity management if it is traveling within the WA state's airspace; and/or
      • quarantines, except if the said flying object's operation within that airspace only involves traveling through it without disembarking.
    • Subclause 4(a) excludes cases where the flying object has been hijacked by rogue actors, or by those that have mutinied against the WA or the said WA state, and other analogous circumstances of loss of control.
  5. Jurisdiction.
    • The WA reserves the right to regulate the use and jurisdiction of each WA state's airspace as well as the operation of all flying objects under the jurisdiction of a WA state (or WA organs) for the safety, security and collective benefits of all WA member states, subject to extant resolutions.
    • The IASA is responsible for implementing and enforcing this resolution.
Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations, NPA personnel, and those on NPA deployments will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote. If you are on an NPA deployment without being formally registered as an NPA member, name your deployed nation in your vote.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!


ForAgainstAbstainPresent
6101
 
Last edited:
Some explanation as author:

This is a third re-draft - it has been pulled twice for various reasons, largely to account for RP for those that do not live on planet Earth.

This resolution defines what "airspace" is within the parameters of the GA. Airspace is now defined as up to the end of the "exobase" where barometric conditions do not apply (ie there is no air pressure), and anything beneath is established as the sovereign territory of a WA state. It also establishes that the WA has the right to further regulate jurisdiction matters concerning aircraft safety and operation.

  1. Airspace is now defined as up to the end of the "exobase" where barometric conditions do not apply (ie there is no air pressure). This has the convenience of not having to conflict with past resolutions on satellites and space debris etc.
  2. Also, according to Randall Munroe, anything which only has an exosphere but not a proper atmosphere beneath can't fly a plane. Note that the UN (the Outer Space Treaty) also dodges the definition of what constitutes outer space.
  3. The resolution uses the common law doctrine of "ad coelum" (although it's not mentioned), modified to the extent that sovereignty applies up to exobase but not beyond. It also means that conveniently, the sky above "WA waters" is considered sovereign airspace of the WA state, but not beyond.
 
This has been withdrawn pending whether any changes are required after [2024] GAS 9 which is a related legality challenge that I won recently. I'll resubmit when a ruling comes along.

If the entire resolution comes back without changes, I'd reopen the old thread.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top