FAILED: GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION: Rights for Intelligent Beings[Archived] [Complete]

GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION AT VOTE
Rights for Intelligent Beings

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights

Strength: Mild

Proposed by: Bears Armed Mission

Description: The World Assembly,

Aware that the peoples of many nations believe in the existence of various kinds of non-Human beings that approach, rival, or surpass, the average Human in intelligence,

Believing that species should not be considered valid grounds for discrimination between intelligent beings, in and of itself, and that even nations that do not as yet have contact with any intelligent beings other than humans would not suffer from having laws already in place just in case that situation ever changes,

Concerned that some governments might however wish to discriminate unfairly between intelligent beings on the grounds of species, perhaps even concerning matters upon which this organisation has passed resolutions, on the argument that the term always used is “Human Rights” and that those rights are therefore legally guaranteed only to Humans;

1. Defines the adjective ‘sapient’ as meaning “possessed of self-awareness, free will, and intelligence that at the least closely approaches the lower end of the ‘average’ range for Humans (Homo sapiens)”, and the noun ‘Sapient’ [or ‘sapient’] as covering both “any being who is sapient in his, her or its own right” and “any member of a species or other category whose average members are normally sapient during at least one stage of their existences";

2. Requires that all WA member nations recognise all Sapients as legally ‘Human’ for the general purpose of all rights that are guaranteed or urged for Humans by WA resolutions, and therefore grant those beings -- regardless of species -- all of the rights covered by those resolutions that they grant to Humans, unless those beings genuinely possess any innate physical and/or psychological differences from typical Humans (or mental limitations compared to typical Humans) that would actually make doing this unfair in itself;

3. Requires any member-nation that declares any WA-guaranteed rights inappropriate and/or unfair for any sapient beings to grant those beings alternative rights, of a more appropriate and fairer nature, to as comparable an extent as the nature of those beings reasonably makes practical;

4. Establishes an agency called the ‘WA Sapience Evaluation Centre’ (or ‘WASEC’), within WASP, and
A. Institutes a general right of appeal from member nations’ legal systems to WASEC in any disputes about this resolution’s interpretation, even by or on behalf of any beings whom a government has claimed are not sapient at all;
B. Gives WASEC the right and duty of binding arbitration in any such disputes that are brought before it, with instructions to judge those disputes fairly (without fear or favour) on the basis of observation, common sense, scientific study (when that seems necessary), and its own previous rulings;
C. Instructs WASEC to inform the governments of all WA member-nations of those rulings;
D. Requires that all WA member nations acknowledge WASEC’s rulings as valid legal precedents;

5. Strongly urges all member-nations to abolish any unfair discrimination between sapient beings on the basis of species that their laws might currently allow in any matters that are not covered by any other WA Resolution.

Co-author: St Edmund.


This came to a vote on the floor of the WA General Assembly at approximately 1700 GMT, Thursday, 15 December 2011, or 12:00 p.m. EST, Thursday, 15 December 2011 and will end at approximately 1700 GMT Monday, 19 December 2011, or 12:00 pm EST, Monday, 19 December 2011.

TNP-resident WA members, please post your position on the resolution in this thread, or send it to me by PM here, or by TG at nationstates.net.
 
Voting on this resolution has ended.

Thanks to those nations who cast their votes. Your participation is a great help to the region.

This topic has been locked and sent to the Archives for safekeeping. If you would like this topic to be re-opened for further discussion, please contact the WA Delegate, a Global Moderator, or an Administrator for assistance. Thank you.
 
Back
Top