- TNP Nation
- Castle in Confidence
- Discord
- .wonderess
On the Creation of the World Exposition of Regions
- Thread starter Wonderess
- Start date
- TNP Nation
- Castle in Confidence
- Discord
- .wonderess
What do y'all think?
- TNP Nation
- sil_dorsett
- Discord
- sildorsett
This is interesting in that it gives the Regional Assembly a second chance to review what exactly the Regional Assembly can and cannot propose. I listed a bunch of powers that I found within the constibilicode in the last thread where something like this appeared, and once again I'm not sure where this fits, except for one small quirk...
The list:
an act to enact, amend, or repeal a law,
a motion to declare an emergency,
a declaration of war,
an override of the Vice Delegate's rejection of an applicant,
an override of a Delegate's veto,
a confirmation of a government official which requires confirmation,
a motion to remove a Security Council member,
a motion to remove a government official,
a motion to recognize a treaty,
a motion to allow the Serving Delegate to assign Border Control powers beyond the three member limit,
a mandate to the NPAF,
an override of an NPAF deployment,
a motion to edit the line of succession,
+ a non-effective resolution (as it in has no legal standing) to state a view or make a recommendation.[note]http://forum.thenorthpacific.org/single/?p=10123265&t=9126183[/note](from Zyvet, click the link below)
In the beginning it sounds like the last part of that list, a non-binding resolution, and instruction to the executive of what we would like to see done. Clause 11 calls that into question. So my question to the proposer is this... Is this a non-binding resolution or is it binding law that you are proposing? That'll determine whether we'll need to review the legality of this.
I could see this being reworded into a non-binding resolution if it isn't already, a way for the RA to tell the executive that we would like to see this done.
The other question I would then have is... How would this event be distinguishable from the NationStates World Fair?
The list:
an act to enact, amend, or repeal a law,
a motion to declare an emergency,
a declaration of war,
an override of the Vice Delegate's rejection of an applicant,
an override of a Delegate's veto,
a confirmation of a government official which requires confirmation,
a motion to remove a Security Council member,
a motion to remove a government official,
a motion to recognize a treaty,
a motion to allow the Serving Delegate to assign Border Control powers beyond the three member limit,
a mandate to the NPAF,
an override of an NPAF deployment,
a motion to edit the line of succession,
+ a non-effective resolution (as it in has no legal standing) to state a view or make a recommendation.[note]http://forum.thenorthpacific.org/single/?p=10123265&t=9126183[/note](from Zyvet, click the link below)
In the beginning it sounds like the last part of that list, a non-binding resolution, and instruction to the executive of what we would like to see done. Clause 11 calls that into question. So my question to the proposer is this... Is this a non-binding resolution or is it binding law that you are proposing? That'll determine whether we'll need to review the legality of this.
I could see this being reworded into a non-binding resolution if it isn't already, a way for the RA to tell the executive that we would like to see this done.
The other question I would then have is... How would this event be distinguishable from the NationStates World Fair?
- TNP Nation
- Castle in Confidence
- Discord
- .wonderess
Firstly, I would say that in order to avoid legal hurdles, this will be a non binding resolution that is just an advisement.
Secondly, great question! This is an Exposition hosted by The North Pacific with the interests and role of The North Pacific at the forefront of the Exposition's vision. I believe this is necessary in order to remind the world of The North Pacific's role and wellbeing despite the turmoil that surrounds the other large regions currently.
Also: I have been advised that it would be best to consider bringing this proposal to an official vote after the next general election as to allow for a smooth development process and stable ministry without needing to worry about the transfer of power. Thoughts?
Secondly, great question! This is an Exposition hosted by The North Pacific with the interests and role of The North Pacific at the forefront of the Exposition's vision. I believe this is necessary in order to remind the world of The North Pacific's role and wellbeing despite the turmoil that surrounds the other large regions currently.
Also: I have been advised that it would be best to consider bringing this proposal to an official vote after the next general election as to allow for a smooth development process and stable ministry without needing to worry about the transfer of power. Thoughts?
- TNP Nation
- Castle in Confidence
- Discord
- .wonderess
I understand your concerns, but I respectfully disagree. The region could learn so much and also grow by hosting a great meeting of its neighbors and allies. A generic World's Fair would take The North Pacific's role out of the event by focusing on the world as a whole. Plus, there would be no way to know or regulate who is coming to such a fair. I've noted the weakening of participation in Foreign Affairs and Culture. What better way to energize participation than to create the event of the year that solidifies our relationships with other regions and even creates new ones. Trust is a commodity that can be hard to come by today. It is my hope that the Exposition could increase the treasury of trust while also spreading the culture, values, and success of The North Pacific even further. Another word I have heard thrown around when discussing The North Pacific is "stagnation". I believe that this comes from a lack of exploration, communication, and association with entities outside TNP gates. Not only can we help others, but others could be given the opportunity to grow and strengthen our government, role plays, and culture. This is a celebration of The North Pacific as a hallmark of regions and a region that can be trusted to aid its allies and even listen to their ideas from time to time.Syrixia:
- TNP Nation
- Veniyerris
- Discord
- BMWSurfer#1965
NSWF was a coughs minor diplomatic incident last year. Not quite sure we want to organize another oneSyrixia:
This may be a dead proposal now, but if not: I really don't believe there will such a vast amount of participation, particularly given what happened at the last such similar event TNP was involved with, that 7 pavilions will be necessary, 8 including the Exposition Center which, in itself, would seem to be a duplication of the Pavilion of Regional Relations. You might do better to have 3 pavilions or thereabouts.
It might also be a good place to reinforce our Admins findings regarding that last incident, I use the word 'reinforce,' because I would hope that not only would a formal apology/explanation from our Admins be issued to all that were directly involved, regions and nations, but that such an apology also be made on the main NS forum.
It might also be a good place to reinforce our Admins findings regarding that last incident, I use the word 'reinforce,' because I would hope that not only would a formal apology/explanation from our Admins be issued to all that were directly involved, regions and nations, but that such an apology also be made on the main NS forum.
This thread hasn't been posted in for 2 months. If you have a concern or suggestion for the TNP admin team, you should really make it in the appropriate forum for that. This is for RA business.
