Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to The North Pacific!
Where the democracy is strong, the debate robust, and the rum plentiful.

The North Pacific is one of the oldest and most powerful regions in NationStates. We pride ourselves on our strong democracy, openness, and transparency.

The region is affectionately called TNP. TNP is home to over 4,000 nations, called TNPers, and we are always looking for more to join us. We are glad to see you here and hope you decide become a TNPer yourself!

As a new arrival, you may be bewildered with everything that is going on. We understand, and for this reason, we have prepared this quick introduction to TNP. Unpack your bags, make yourself at home, and enjoy your stay :) .

First step: register an account

Please do not register more than one account on the forum. If you are not happy with the account you have created and want to change the name, reach out to an administrator.

You are currently viewing the forum as a guest. This means that you can only view some of the forum areas, and you cannot participate in any of them. To be able to join in or even see most of the things we will describe below, you will need to register an account. This is a quick and easy process that you can start by clicking here.

Our Government

The North Pacific is a constitutional democracy. We have a constitution, a bill of rights, and a legal code, which you can read here. Our government has four branches:

The Legislature consists of the Regional Assembly (RA), which votes to enact and amend legislation. Discussions in the RA are moderated by the Speaker, who is elected from among the RA members, and their Deputies. Everyone with a nation in the region can apply to join the RA.

The Executive consists of the Delegate, Vice Delegate, the Cabinet of Ministers, and the Executive Staff. The Delegate and Vice Delegate are elected by the RA, and are accountable to it. The Ministers are appointed by the Delegate, and each one of them manage their own staff. Together, the Executive runs the day-to-day affairs of the government. Broad areas the Executive is responsible for include home affairs, foreign affairs, World Assembly affairs, communications, culture, and our military. Everyone with a nation in the region can apply to join the Executive Staff and work in one of the Ministries.

The Judiciary consists of a single court, which has two Associate Justices and one Chief Justice. All Justices are elected by the RA, and are accountable to it. The court can authoritatively answer questions of law, void actions of other officials that have been brought for review, and decide criminal cases. Interacting with the Judiciary is the Attorney General, also elected by the RA, who serves as the chief prosecutor in criminal trials and as legal counsel to the Executive.

The Security Council is generally considered as a separate branch. It is a body of members that monitor the region for security purposes. They help protect the in-game delegacy, help with delegacy transitions during elections, and also provide a mechanism of response in the case of an illegal in-game delegate. They are accountable to the RA.

You can find a list of current government officials here.

Ways to Get Involved

The best way to start getting involved is to apply for citizenship. Citizenship allows you to access all forum areas and join the various government and community activities. The application process should be easy and fast, and the only prerequisite is having a nation in the region. Once you are a citizen, you will also be eligible to vote and be a candidate in elections for the various government offices, such as Delegate and Vice Delegate - there is an election roughly every two months.

If the description of the government has enticed you, you should definitely consider contributing in the various branches! As a citizen, you can take part in the Regional Assembly, where you can legislate and scrutinize the government. You can also apply to join the Executive Staff, and get involved in any Ministry that interests you.

If you would like to poke around the forum and interact with our community before deciding to become a citizen, you should register your residency. Once you do so, you will be able to access most of the areas of this forum and join the various other activities. Here is a sample:

You can participate in our Role Play section, where you can write the story of your nation, interact with your neighbours on The North Pacific map, and join the Democratic Union.

You can drop by our World Assembly section, to discuss resolutions at vote, draft your own resolutions, and determine how our WA Delegate represents us in the World Assembly.

If you want to experience and learn about the military gameplay, one of the most exciting aspects of the game, you can enlist in the North Pacific Army and start serving TNP as a proud soldier!


If you have more questions, you can check for answers in the The North Pacific FAQs. The Yellow Pages in particular provide a comprehensive guide to the region in a single thread.

If you cannot find the answer to your questions there, or if you are having any trouble with the forum, you can contact our forum administrators and global moderators here.

Username:   Password:
Locked Topic
Amending Security Council Admission Requirements
Topic Started: Oct 8 2017, 01:16 AM (293 Views)
Member Avatar
Haven't a clue

Section 5.1: Requirements and Admission
4. Any person with an account on the regional forum and a nation in The North Pacific may apply to join the Council, as long as their nation satisfies any influence and endorsement requirements for membership. Any applicant who does not meet the appropriate requirements, or who ceases to meet them, is automatically rejected.
5. Security Councilors must meet the same influence and endorsement requirements as applicants to the Council, and may be suspended or removed if they fail to do so.
6. The influence requirement is a Soft Power Disbursement Rating within The North Pacific greater than or equal to 182,500, or an influence rank within The North Pacific greater than or equal to Apprentice, whichever is lower. The endorsement requirement is at least 500, or 50 percent of the serving Delegate's endorsement count, whichever is lower.
7. By a two-thirds majority vote, the Security Council may exempt nations who have expended their influence in service to the region from any influence requirements to join the Council or to remain a member. Exemptions granted in such a manner remain valid until the exempted nation regains the required influence level.

Instead of putting forth a proper proposal I wish instead to hear everyone's opinions first whether or not the SC requirements should be amended because I understand that when contemplating changes to such a necessary body it can be challenging to weight the pros and cons and how it may impact future SC applications.

Right now under the requirements a resident/citizen of the region must have a SPDR of 182,200 and 500 endorsements(or half of the delegates endorsements), right now the number of residents/citizens that meet this requirement including the delegate and current SC members stands at 33. In the SC applications of both Kasch and Plembobria the same question has been proposed to both, "should their be a cap of how many members can their be in the Security Council?"

Should I had proposed this it would've bumped the minimum amount of endorsements to 600, while only increasing the percentage of the delegates endorsements to only 55%. Thus the SDFR minimum would've been bumped to 219,000. These three increases combined I estimate that the number of residents/citizens that would meet this requirement decreases to around 23-24. So yes under these requirements Pembobria would not be eligible(whether or not Section 5.7 would be used to waive the influence requirements).

Why bring this up? Why not, I believe that there should be discussions surrounding the minimum requirements to the SC every once and a while, especially now that the council will have ten members, potentially eleven and that the question concerning the number of councilors has been asked.
Posted Image
Private First Class

Posted Image---Posted Image

Posted Image-Posted Image-Posted Image

Always expect the unexpected
Offline Profile Goto Top
Member Avatar
110% Zoom

I don't think having a bunch of people on the SC is necessarily a bad thing. Having a crapload of people who are able, willing, meet the requirements, and have received the confidence of the Security Council and Regional Assembly keeping us safe sounds great to me.

Posted Image
All the staff
The Northern Sentinel
Spoiler: click to toggle

Offline Profile Goto Top
Member Avatar

I don't think changes are necessary because candidates to the security council need to fulfil other unofficial requirments that are not in the law
,Posted Image
Sergant (SGT)
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image

Posted Image

Minister of Home Affairs

Previous Positions
Offline Profile Goto Top
Member Avatar
>>> @requires(fluff=True)

I'm not convinced this is necessary. Seems an overreaction to a question that one person asked to applicants, which both applicants answered negatively to.
Yatasal kul SeredrauRiensifir M. SanguineThe Legendary Fluffiness of Darcania
Speaker of the Regional AssemblyElection Commissioner
Posted ImagePosted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted ImagePosted Image
Ribbons, Medals, and Awards
Positions, Former and Current, in no order whatsoever (have fun)
Offline Profile Goto Top
Lord Ravenclaw
Member Avatar

I'm not sure why it's a bad thing to have a large security council body, if anything having a large and visible security council only strengthens our image as a bastion of democracy and stability.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Goto Top

I've held firm the belief that if a body of action such as the Regional Assembly admits a person to the Council, they have taken into account the current number of applicants and have agreed that the addition of another will not negatively influence the capability of the Council to work and act as Lord Ravenclaw has rightly stated above, a bastion of democracy and stability.

If it became a problem backed with actual evidence that the number of Councillors decreased the efficiency to operate as the Council, then that is something we can address if and when it arises. But at the moment, or at any moment in the past that I am aware of, the only number-related problems the Council has faced are low roster counts and low endorsement counts.
Online Profile Goto Top
Horsley land

I agree with the sentiments above, as long as SC members are diligent and do the job effectively then the size of it isn't necessarily an issue
Offline Profile Goto Top
Member Avatar
Haven't a clue

I suppose I should actually reply :)

I am not disappointed in any of the replies that were given as I did assume that at this time there was no need to change the current requirements and am very pleased with the replies by current SC members. At least for the for see-able future should this topic come up again I suppose some one could use this thread as a reference.
Posted Image
Private First Class

Posted Image---Posted Image

Posted Image-Posted Image-Posted Image

Always expect the unexpected
Offline Profile Goto Top
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · RA Proposal and Discussion Archive · Next Topic »
Locked Topic

Bug reportReport a Bug with this site
Theme by tiptopolive