Cronaal:
Nebula:
Although the RP is mine, the issue of planet names should be a group discussion.
First, can we all agree on the planet arrangement that I've proposed above?
Let me revise your list, add more description.
~ A desolate planet, it's surface dusty and most likely nearby a sun.
~ An inferno planet, one of the main gases being similar to that of the greenhouse gases on Earth/TNP-Land
~ The North Pacific Planet
~ An ice planet, it's of similar temperatures to Southern Greenland meanie it has possibility of being inhabited.
~ A barren wasteland of ice, unlike the aforementioned it's closer to Antarctica and is entirely uninhabitable by all but a handful of rare life forms.
~ An asteroid belt, possibly separating us from another reach of space due to it's hostility.
~ A gas giant, it's filled with Hydrogen and Helium. It could be owned by corporations or nations.
~ A gas giant, it's main feature is it's ammonia
~ The third gas giant, it's rich with water but it's also filled with methane.
~ Comets.
~ A small handful of generic planets, earth-like but still different. Possibly 2 or 3 making them valuable assets to an empire.
I like your list, but with two issues:
~ we don't really need two ice planets, one should be habitable with difficulty, but the other should be a wasteland like Mars, where it's too cold to snow
~ "a small handful of generic planets" --- it just seems unreasonable to have more than one planet in the habitable zone.
Now, that doesn't mean that there aren't other easily habitable bodies within the solar system, for example, about two moons that, by some odd coincidence, are reasonably habitable. (For example, one could orbit Planet 4, the habitable ice planet, and have minor greenhouse effect, so it has a somewhat thin atmosphere, but is at about the right temperature to support life.)
Thoughts?