[Complete][SC] At Vote: Repeal "Liberate Liberal Haven"

---

Description: WA Security Council Resolution #144: Liberate Liberal Haven shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Recognizing Liberal Haven is a peaceful community, which does not engage in aggressive hostile actions against any other region,

Realizing Liberal Haven was invaded by an aggressive multinational force which assumed the delegacy, and placed a secret password in place, whilst simultaneously beginning to eject the native population,

Confirming this hostile action by aggressive foreign forces, goes against the Security Council's mission of spreading inter-regional peace and goodwill, Liberal Haven was liberated by Security Council resolution #144, thus allowing defender forces to enter the region, and return it to native control,

Shocked that the nation of The Republic of Asquithania, was able to assume the delegacy and began ejecting the native population once again, in an attempt to refound the region under their control, against the natives wishes,

Noting the regional natives desire to refound the region under their own control,

Understanding that without the ability to password protect Liberal Haven, the region remains highly susceptible to refound sniping, should the natives attempt to refound without the ability to password the region beforehand,

Thus Believing native rights should take precedent over the wishes of the international community as a whole, and the ability to protect the region should be rightfully returned to native control,

Further Believing, Security Council resolution #144 has served its intended purpose,

Hereby repeals Security Council Resolution #144 Liberate Liberal Haven.

---

Please vote: For | Against | Abstain | Present

"Abstain" means that you wish for the Delegate to not vote on the resolution at all.
"Present" means that you effectively choose not to participate in this vote. "Present" has no effect on how the Delegate votes.

Posts which do not include an explicit and unambiguous vote are not counted in the tally.

Ministry vote recommendation: Against

Ministry Review
Written by HMS Unicorn

Repealing liberation resolutions once the target region has been returned to the control of the native community is standard procedure in the Security Council. However, this case is not one where this typical scenario applies.

Control of the region by the native community is very weak. There is very serious risk that, as soon as the liberation is repealed, the region will be attacked once more, necessitating the passage of yet another liberation for the same region. Some raider regions are even advertising that they intend to attack the region as soon as the liberation is repealed. The situation is exacerbated by the fact that there are serious doubts about the identity of many members of the region, including the current delegate.

For these reasons, we believe that the repeal of the liberation is premature and very risky, and we recommend a vote against it.

Apologies, with the WA inactivity of late, I missed this one.

I vote against. As soon as the liberation gets repealed, the region will be raided again. Raiders are even advertising that they are going to do so.

In light of the above information I vote against.

I vote Against.

~ Tomb

Present.

You make a compelling case.
We The Most Holy vote against.

Against

For. I like Chester

Against.

Against

Voting on this resolution has ended.

Thanks to those nations who cast their votes. Your participation is a great help to the region.

This topic has been locked and sent to the Archives for safekeeping. If you would like this topic to be re-opened for further discussion, please contact the WA Delegate, a Global Moderator, or an Administrator for assistance. Thank you.