Like many people, I have been dismayed at the quality of the field declared thus far in the judicial election.
This time there seems to be a particular problem: I have personally spoken to four good people about running, and the answer is always the same, "I do not want to share a bench with Roman and Flap. especially Roman." The early declaration by these two candidates seems to have put others off from standing. I would say the same is true for myself. I would not preclude standing for justice, but not where there is a chance i would have to share a bench with Romanoffia. Been there, done that. No thanks.
in our laws there is a provision for when the names on the ballot are unacceptable to the electorate. We can vote "reopen Nominations", and express our desire for new candidates. So if the ballot remains as at present, I will be voting Abstain - Reopen Nominations.
Now, of course, Roman and Flap would have the right to remain on the ballot for the second round. But my hope is that, for the good of the region, they would step aside to allow a clean slate.
In regards to the AG election, I am not sure whether COE and ASTA are actually standing, but if the ballot remains JJ, paulwall and Yrkidding I will likewise be voting Abstain - Reopen Nominations.
That is my thinking at the moment.