(21:37:42) punkd: This X is for Y only
(21:37:52) Astarial: Only one fridge has beer
(21:37:55) COE: They usually constrain it to the nomination thread, but this time, ommitted that rule
(21:37:56) Romanoffia: The ultimate protest vote:
http://forum.thenorthpacific.org/single/?p=8093797&t=7051909
Funkadelia(21:37:57) Astarial: There is a difference between the fridges!
(21:38:00) Astarial: A big one!
(21:38:09) Romanoffia: I have a big fridge.
(21:38:11) punkd: Only X has Y...somewhat different than their statement
(21:38:19) Astarial: Again, no, it's the SCOPE
(21:38:20) Astarial: OF THE ONLY
(21:38:22) Astarial: FOR FUCK'S SAKE.
(21:38:23) Funkadelia: The EC said "This X is for Y only", it should have been "Y's can only be in X."
(21:38:31) punkd: This X is for Y only...pretty clear.
(21:38:36) Astarial: Yes, it is
(21:38:41) Astarial: and you cannot understand it correctly.
(21:38:48) Karpathos: LOL
(21:38:52) Romanoffia: punkdOnly X has Y...somewhat different than their statement <<<<<< Funny you should say that considering you stated in one court thread that common sense has nothing to do with the law.
(21:38:53) punkd: I understand fine.
(21:38:59) Karpathos: Elu, busy with all those Voting Booth posts?
(21:39:00) Funkadelia: Obviously you don't
(21:39:00) Astarial: This X is for Y only is *different* from Only this X is for Y.