Recent content by Attempted Socialism

I, Attempted Socialism, do hereby solemnly swear that during my term as Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, I will uphold the ideals of Democracy, Freedom, and Justice of The Region of The North Pacific. I will use the powers and rights granted to me through The North Pacific Constitution and...

Delegate: 1. < Simone > 2. < Robespierre > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Vice Delegate: < Chipoli > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Speaker: 1. < AraFuttio > 2. < Cloud > 3. < Noscar > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

I appreciate the nomination, but I must decline.

I also second the motion for an immediate vote.

Against. It feels like queue-stuffing, but even if it isn't, it's a proposal by sanctioned raiders and their arguments hold no water.

Against. If it's a joke it should have been funny, and if it's not a joke...

Against.

For.

Court Justice: 1. < Pallaith > 2. < Lord Dominator > 3. < Eluvatar > 4. < Vivanco > 5. < Luconovos > 6. < > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

Just to check, this was where you first said I wouldn't be asked to recuse myself, then you changed your mind and asked me to recuse myself, at which point I recused myself without any argument? Because if recusing myself by the request of the defense is incompetence and corruption... I guess...

This is the crux of your lie. Tlomz made a motion, in response to my error, for a mistrial. I have never (Nor will I ever) fault Tlomz for that. Why? Because Tlomz didn't lie to me and say that he feared a later court case. Tlomz didn't say this: Rather than letting me step on the rake on my...

Yes, exactly. You tried to fabricate some threat out of that last reply from me. That was the point I made after you tried to use your fabricated threat to hinder my application to the regional Bar. The genius part here is that you're posting your admission that you knew you were backdooring me...

You admitted as much to me in private and in the conversation with your co-counsel and the prosecutor, so that ship has definitely sailed. It's also something that I have shown before, so it's not like it's a secret. You most definitely did. This is the second time I see you make this hollow...

I don't see the need. It's unrelated to my question, I never argued that it wasn't a screw up, and at this point it's quite disturbing that you think that's what I am trying to reargue. I am not trying to get you to step on that particular landmine, no. I do wish to highlight to voters that not...

I don't recall asking about perjury or fabricated evidence in a trial. I asked about someone admitting that they lied to the Court (in order to gain an undue advantage). Can I ask you to please answer the question, or, if you need further information, ask for elaboration rather than avoiding the...