[SC - Withdrawn] Condemn Lily

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cretox

Somehow, Palpatine has returned
TNP Nation
Cretox State
Discord
Cretox#0125
sc.jpg

Condemn Lily
Category: Condemnation | Target: Lily
Proposed by: Aredita | Onsite Topic

The Security Council;

RECOGNIZING that the region of Lily has caused destruction to many regions using their ruthless invasion tactics, such as destroying World Factbook Entries with advertisements.

OBSERVING that Lily slaughters innocent regions with no initiative but to gain power and advertise themselves.

BELIEVING that by condemning Lily, they will understand the true horror in their actions.

POSTULATING the fact that it is the Security Councils’ responsibility to take action and condemn these acts.

DISAPPOINTED that little to no action has been taken from the Security Council to intervene.

HOPING that the Security Council will understand the enormity of Lily’s horrendous acts, and will take decisive action to condemn them.

Herby condemns Lily.
Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations and NPA personnel will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!

For Against Abstain Present
0300
 
Last edited:
What a garbage proposal. Condemn Lily could go somewhere if someone with their wits about them wrote it. Against.
 
Burn it with fire.
Against - even if Lily deserved a condemnation it wouldn’t be this one.
 
Garbage resolution.

How this managed to reach quorum is astounding given how dense and blank this is. Against.
Probably by the rubber-stamp squad and delegates of tiny UCRs which were tagged by Lily.
 
Against. No effort, no research, no forum drafting, no specifics, no examples, no support.
I agree with about 5/6 of what you said, but being against due to forum drafting is always a dumb reason. If it’s a good legal proposal, why not? In this case it’s not the former, so non-WA Against.
 
I agree with about 5/6 of what you said, but being against due to forum drafting is always a dumb reason. If it’s a good legal proposal, why not? In this case it’s not the former, so non-WA Against.
Did you hear that? 5/6 TNPers approve of my job performance! And the sixth one, well he's a dirty little...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top