Search results

1545

I am no longer a TNP citizen, so please remove me from the rolls of the Cards Guild. I do not wish to take a spot or cards from someone who is a citizen of TNP. Thank you. Your Comrade, -Namwenia

Author & former TNPer here to say "Hi." I appreciate the optimism in listing this as "Approaching Quorum" with 0 approvals @Magecastle The idea behind this came from another new author who had posted a one line "Star Viewing Day" proposal. I thought it was a nice idea, reached out to them, and...

I renounce my citizenship as I have left The North Pacific. I appreciate you all and thank you.

A bump as I haven't gotten any real comments on the NS forum since my extensive re-write except to ask why asbestos should be treated differently than other chemicals. The difference being that it's a physical vs chemical hazard, hence the difference in treatment. IF the current proposal to...

Non-TNP - For

Against

For

For

Against

Against While I agree with the intent, however, denial of rights based on incarceration for voter fraud could potentially be abused by individual member states as it is not well defined. Also, a corrupt government may incarcerate individuals for sedition or treason, only to later have it...

Present I will vote with the IFV as I am unfamiliar with the nation or NS Sports.

For

For I am voting with the IFV

For

Destination nation: Namwenia Link to card: Namwenia (S3) Card Farmer that owns the card: Card Farmer 3494 Will A Card Need Junked In Order to Gift it?: No Is this a premium request: No

For

For

I support repeal, as I am working on a better replacement that genuinely addresses the issues and allows for leaving non-friable asbestos in place. This is not it. Against.

Court Justice: < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes >

If the EC is going to be adjusting the rules to ensure clarity in the future, this is unlikely to be necessary. I'll withdraw at this point.

My point and the point of the proposed legislation is that the intent of saying "I nominate myself" is to declare oneself as a candidate in almost all circumstances. The added step of accepting ones nomination feels unnecessary and this minor change should hopefully minimize confusion in the...

No, this edit is purely for self nominations as worded. The language that requires acceptance of nominations from other citizens remains unchanged.

I thought about that. It likely could go either way, but with how minor of a change it would be in the Legal Code and as that is where the legal definition of who is / is not a candidate resides, I opted to propose it this way.

For (EDIT: No longer has resident nation in TNP) - SR (2023-03-01)

Following the recent confusion regarding Rae's self-declaration of candidacy and the Election Commission's decision to deny their candidacy based on the wording of the self-nomination while acknowledging the need to clarify the self-nomination process, I propose the following adjustment to the...

For Well written and seems fairly simple, in a fine way.

I see no reason to delay further. I second the motion.

I agree with GBM's concerns and voice support for St. George's proposed expansion of the application processing timeline.

For I vote with the IFV as I am unfamiliar with those in question and trust the judgement of the team preparing the IFV.