Search results

I, Great Robertia, do hereby solemnly swear that during my term as Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, I will uphold the ideals of Democracy, Freedom, and Justice of The Region of The North Pacific. I will use the powers and rights granted to me through The North Pacific Constitution and Legal...

Delegate: < Pallaith > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Vice Delegate: < Hulldom > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Speaker: < Sil Dorsett > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

My main issue with this proposal draft is why it is a concern of the WA? Whether a national animal is protected in such a way sounds like a domestic issue, especially if it doesn't grant any protections beyond the borders of that member state as your proposed idea does. Because what this...

As Daarwyrth, I have posted this proposal draft on the NS forums, but I'd also like the draft to gather feedback here. So, please feel free to comment! :) WA Military Non-Aggression Act Category: Global Disarmament | Strength: Strong Let it be known that this honourable assembly of nations...

I have updated the draft in light of feedback and commentary offered on the forums.

Nation in The North Pacific: Great Robertia Ministry you are interested in joining: Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Optional) Previous experience in this area of government: Ambassador of Forest to the Rejected Realms

Hello! I have been drafting this proposal on the forums as Daarwyrth for a while now, but I wanted to post it on these forums as well to see if there is any feedback or commentary here that could help improve the proposal. Category: Political Stability | Strength: Mild To stand at the...

Nation: Great Robertia I pledge loyalty to The North Pacific, obedience to her laws, and responsible action as a member of her society. I pledge to only register one nation to vote in The North Pacific. I pledge that no nation under my control will wage war against the North Pacific. I...

That is why Clause 7 includes the following line: "or grant them close equivalents to such rights, privileges and duties if such did not previously exist within the receiving state's jurisdiction" This means that no new rights, privileges or duties have to be created, only that the new...

Could you explain what you mean with the comment about Clause 7 and 8? Those were included after it was pointed out to me that nations should have the ability to grant new inhabitants additional rights if they want to. Furthermore, Imperium Anglorum mentioned that there should be an automatic...

Yes, it would be great to know the reasoning behind the opposition.

Mentioning specific regions and nations was suggested to me by posters in the NS SC forums during the drafting process, and especially to list what those regions and nations have done for the LGBTQ+ community. As I noticed the advice was given by SC regulars, I followed it.

May I ask what you find awkward and weird about it?

1. "an "affected inhabitant" as an inhabitant of any area of a member state that is directly affected by a transition". As per the definition of "inhabitant" as can be found here, no, corporations are not considered "inhabitants". 2. Oh [insert expletive], I completely missed that, damn it. That...

Could you specify which elements you believe are not worded well enough, or aren't strong enough? I'm asking to know what mistakes to avoid in future proposal writing :)

Purely to satisfy my own curiosity, would you be willing to say why you're against? :) if not, then I of course understand!

I am quite curious myself. If protections are granted for people to be able to have a faith, to practice their religion without fear of persecution or reprisal, the same should apply to the ability to renounce one's faith. Apostasy - namely the act of renouncing one's faith - needs to be...

The proposal has been withdrawn.

Law students are the future of the national judiciaries of member nations. They're going to lead it as lawyers, judges, prosecutors etc. etc., and considering how many areas and domains of law as well as daily life are affected by the World Assembly, they will need quality expertise and...

I've removed the proposal from queue today, after commentary from Imperium Anglorum on the definition of Clause 1.c. The proposal will be re-drafted at a later point.

Apologies if my post is seen as interruptive, but as the author of the repeal resolution in question, I was hoping to share a few thoughts with you: I realise that there will be people who will feel as if this repeal proposal is anti-environmental, but I assure you that it's not. GAR #553 is...

In light of Big Boyz's counter-campaign, I have sent the following WA TG campaign with counter-argumentation to his arguments: Regarding Claim #2 Regarding Claim #3 Regarding Claim #4 As my counter-counter-argumentation has hopefully proven, Big Boyz refuses to move away from his...