Search results

Really interesting, guys. :)

The Delegate's information is correct, I'm just getting back from holidays and am seeking legal counsel at the moment.

I am only guilty of not complying with Section 7.1.4. (which is outside the Criminal Code -- Section 1). Which is, I think, the only thing that the Attorney-General did not charge me with. I did what I did with the fullest respect for the law in civil disobedience -- I would not condone any sort...

May I remind the Court of this Reference Case?

A Letter from the Capitalis de Societate of The United Defenders League, MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYBODY! Jingle Bells, Jakker Smells, Detag every day. Oh, what fun it is to have applied, endorse and dossier! HEY! Hehe, oh the holidays, how I love you. It’s been very merry indeed in the Sherwood...

Smart decision, Flem. Merry Christmas all!

Lazarus voted against.

Double-post!

A Letter from the Capitalis de Societate of The United Defenders League, MERRY OMIGOD-EXAMS-ARE-OVER (and moreover, Happy Hanukkah)! It has been an absolutely hellish week for me due to exams, but that is now all over and I look forward to the holidays. I hope everyone else is also looking to...

Of course it makes sense. If you're a compliance inspector, you do routine checks out of the blue on places. You don't put an institution in charge of determining when their own inspection occurs (unless you're the government with flexible election dates :P).

I think we would be better served security-wise with checks, than red-tape.

I accept Chas's nomination for Associate Justice.

Well, what about a much smaller number like, seven. Seven is a lucky number. >_>

And you're not legally required to know this information. The WA Registrar is.. Do we reeaaally need to go to court over this issue? Or can you recognize that you're getting information not obligated for people to give by law?

Our system is functional when the issue isn't a highly political and contentious issue. Perhaps the vote should have just been called off and the Council decided -- condemning an organization that has worked alongside the NPA on various missions is a big political decision and probably wasn't...

I think to avoid the issue of Non-WA Members or Multi-Citizens being removed of their equality or witch-hunts for that matter (+1 for AMOM!): we should simply require a quota of RA Activity (dunno, attendance in twenty-five votes) for all RA Members to vote in the WA. Perhaps Citizens would...

TNP Nation: Unibot III WA Nation: Show me the law where this information is necessary (it is not covered by Section 6.2), since otherwise you're unconstitutionally disfranchising me to gather unnecessary information. Vice Delegate: PM

*rubs his head* This argument again, really? A condemnation is posed for X doing Y to A; but when A votes against the condemnation, people still just want to ignore this fact or diminish it.

Yeah, because TSP voting sternly against this resolution doesn't greatly undermine it. <_<

You used Rachel as evidence? Serious? :duh:

Oh I sure the fact that UDL caught you raiding and reported it to the FRA had nothing to do with the hard-feelings. Nonetheless, your motivations are irrelevant: it's a dreadful resolution that is wholly inaccurate. You've done nothing to defend your resolution. So why should I even bother...

You had your access to The United Defenders League removed, that was what we said in the telegram. You keep focusing on the details of our telegram while wholly neglecting to defend your resolution from substantiated critique.

Seems like it's kind of become a bit of partisan here :P If anyone does want to ask a question regarding this resolution, as the Head of UDL, I am more than capable of answering any questions people may have. I find this resolution to be wholly inaccurate and incorrect, naturally. I will...

But if the IP is different than you can fool NS too. >_< In my personal opinion would should scrap the switcher policy and this WA-notation on voting and instead just have sweeps where a neutral figure calls for everyone to announce where their WA is to them in private -- mandate that they have...

A Letter from the Capitalis de Societate of The United Defenders League, Spare me the drama, oh please spare me! I did not mean "spare" in that way! Yikes. Fortunately, the moderators had a change of heart when they noted that server difficulties had contributed to my mistake during update...

I think an IP would serve you better here. How so? We're only talking about voting in Elections. Not joining the NPA or the SC. Sure, but I'm not planning on being the Delegate or the Vice Delegate, I just want to vote on them. Once again sure, I can understand when you need the data, you...

It's still a useless protocol. >_> That isn't founded in law and could cause people's votes to be invalidated without a basis in law (simply "protocol"). You also tried to chase around to find every switcher in existence in R/D. <_<

I think making voting deliberately more of a challenge is a silly concept in a liberal democratic society. >_> It sounds illiberal to me.

I think something that's bothered anyone who is a defender or raider and also a member of The North Pacific is that The North Pacific has a noticeable trend of wanting a ton of information because it doesn't trust them; a lot of information it doesn't need, frankly. Which tends to just create...

That's ridiculous. The courts told us to go here to solve the problem, now the legislature is telling us not to go anywhere, because it could go back to the Court.