You know I'm sure I could write literal pages on what got me here, but it is so great to see someone with experience willing to step into the job for the first time. You have my full support.
Not really addressing the overall argument because I have no strong opinions either way beyond “some norms are just that and best remain uncodified”, but merely going to say: the neutrality of the presiding officer is a largely Anglophone tradition but is not in any way strange. It’s meant to...
No brainer and no questions other than what’s the state of the inquiry and how does the EC plan to prevent whatever issue occurred in May 2023 going forward?
I agree with what was done even if it really is kind of awful to do it this way. If Gor make the decision, I do not understand why it needed to fall to Chip to make it.