I am in favour of this proposal. Because of the admittedly compelling reasons provided by NVXL, I will briefly explain why. This proposal’s function is to create a broad-brushed framework in which member-nations have to operate. It can’t specify individual ingredients, owing to the different...
The question regarding the rules is far more interesting than the content of this proposal. Even if not illegal for stepping on the GA’s turf, I dislike it nonetheless for its lack of vision. There is a brief suggestion about the SC condemning future nations because of slavery. This could have...
As the coauthor, I am naturally for this proposal. ITSC is a fine resolution where domesric transport is concerned. However, it not only fails to address international transport whatsoever, it also actively prevents further legislation on the topic.
This is badly written in places. I do not think that it should become part of the canon of the Security Council, irrespective of its contribution to the natives. I am therefore against.
I am for this proposal. This is a very comprehensive way of prohibiting whole-life orders for minors, and that is a goal that is worthy of legislation.
This proposal has one argument, and that one argument is not particularly compelling. There is a compelling need to balance the right of minors to protected from harmful content with the right of free press. By not specifying what qualifies as “appropriate”, the target allows member-nations to...
I am for this proposal. It forms part of the growing corpus of legislation that delineates which punishments are acceptable under the law of the General Assembly.