Recent content by Kenmoria

Delegate: 1. < Simone > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Vice Delegate: < Chipoli > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Speaker: 1. < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

This declaration is drier than salted sand and duller than gritted mud. I am against it.

I am in favour of this proposal. Because of the admittedly compelling reasons provided by NVXL, I will briefly explain why. This proposal’s function is to create a broad-brushed framework in which member-nations have to operate. It can’t specify individual ingredients, owing to the different...

I am in favour of this proposal. It addresses the issues of the target well, and it will clear the way for a superior replacement.

The question regarding the rules is far more interesting than the content of this proposal. Even if not illegal for stepping on the GA’s turf, I dislike it nonetheless for its lack of vision. There is a brief suggestion about the SC condemning future nations because of slavery. This could have...

This repeal does not present very convincing arguments, so I am against it.

Could you please provide an example of something intangible or innutritious which is developed for sapient consumption?

As the coauthor, I am naturally for this proposal. ITSC is a fine resolution where domesric transport is concerned. However, it not only fails to address international transport whatsoever, it also actively prevents further legislation on the topic.

This is badly written in places. I do not think that it should become part of the canon of the Security Council, irrespective of its contribution to the natives. I am therefore against.

This is some low-scope, precise legislation which carefully addresses a specific problem. I am therefore for this proposal.

I am for this proposal. This is a very comprehensive way of prohibiting whole-life orders for minors, and that is a goal that is worthy of legislation.

This is absurd. I am present.

Considering that there is native support, I will vote in favour.

Because there are sanctions, I cannot vote as I usually would. I will settle for being present and not voting.

This proposal has one argument, and that one argument is not particularly compelling. There is a compelling need to balance the right of minors to protected from harmful content with the right of free press. By not specifying what qualifies as “appropriate”, the target allows member-nations to...