Nobody knew about the existence of this proposal until 5:41am GMT (12:41am EST; 6:41pm NZDT). If Mage said what he did before that time, he was referring to the old proposal. If he said so after that time, I would be interested in finding out what exactly is illegal about this attempt...
I have zero recollection of Northern Borland saying he did not want a Condemnation. The main sticking point at the time was that NB did not express an opinion either way (nor, having retired already, was he able to).
I was in a huge argument with Mage around the time of GA#666 about whether the IEC served any objectively necessary purpose. I argued it didn't: a member state can always call upon one of the other 20,000+ member states to help with extradition; if all of them refused, there's the possibility of...
Challenge accepted.
This horse was beaten multiple times, almost to death, in the forumside thread. Thank you, at least, for admitting that this particular argument holds a grain of truth. :P
The restrictions imposed by GA#147 on extradition for heinous crimes are de-facto tantamount to...
Could somebody please explain why the original (illegal) repeal enjoyed almost unanimous support while the current repeal is suffering from a wave of unexplained (or very, very inadequately explained) opposition?
I will reiterate the only thing I said in the aforementioned chat:
"GA#663 does the equivalent of telling the Russell Group to set up a committee to co-ordinate merchandise sales across its unis, then telling them they can set any sale restrictions they want, including but not limited to...