[GA - PASSED] Land Reclamation Regulation

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cretox

Somehow, Palpatine has returned
TNP Nation
Cretox State
Discord
Cretox#0125
ga.jpg

Land Reclamation Regulation
Category: Environmental | Industry Affected: All Businesses - Mild
Proposed by: Orca and Narwhal | Coauthor: Honeydewistania | Onsite Topic

Note: This draft was accepted for sponsorship through the World Assembly Accelerator Program. The Ministry of World Assembly Affairs will be recommending a vote in favor of this proposal unless pressing and irreconcilable issues are brought to our attention. If you're interested in participating in this program, we encourage you to apply with your draft(s)!
The World Assembly,

Worried that unregulated land reclamation can lead to ecological damages with long term economic damage, as well as dangers to the health of both people and the environment;

Acknowledging the use of land reclamation by member nations to increase their land area for necessary purposes such as halting urban spread into pristine terrestrial ecosystems, or extending port facilities of growing coastal cities;

Very concerned about the loss of biodiversity hotspots and areas vital for the reproduction of commercially important marine species, as an unintended consequence of land reclamation;

Especially aware of the vulnerability of shallow marine ecosystems and the coastal areas, yet understanding the occasional necessity for their development;

Searching for a way to balance ecological concerns with the necessities of urban development;

Hereby:
  1. Defines:
    1. “land reclamation” as the oceanic construction of new dry land in a nation’s territory;
    2. “impact study” as an independent survey conducted to determine the potential ecological impacts of land reclamation;
  2. Mandates thats a good faith effort to obtain and apply materials that cause as little environmental damage as possible for the physical stage of land reclamation must be made, unless obtaining those materials is incredibly infeasible or costly, in which case the best possible alternative must be used;
  3. Subject to clause 5 of this resolution, orders member nations to prevent a land reclamation project from proceeding if it is likely to cause environmental damage that will severely imperil the health of marine life or those that live nearby;
    1. Clarifies that if the potential damage caused can and will be mitigated to a reasonable level, the land reclamation project may proceed;
  4. Requires member nations to conduct impact studies to determine if proceeding with land reclamation will not violate this resolution;
  5. Requires that results of impact studies must be submitted to the Environmental Survey of the World Assembly (ESWA), and tasks the ESWA with:
    1. issuing special permits to land reclamation projects that would otherwise violate this resolution only if:
      1. not proceeding with land reclamation will severely imperil the health of a nation’s population; or
      2. not proceeding with land reclamation will cause greater environmental damage than doing so;
    2. issuing normal permits to land reclamation projects that will not violate this resolution;
    3. prohibiting land reclamation from taking place if it violates the restrictions laid out by this resolution;
  6. Mandates that land reclamation projects that are issued permits as a result of clause 5a must cause as little environmental damage as feasible, and prohibits land reclamation projects from proceeding if they are denied a permit by the ESWA.
Co-authored by Honeydewistania.
Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations and NPA personnel will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!

[TR][TD] For [/TD][TD] Against [/TD][TD] Abstain [/TD][TD] Present [/TD][/TR][TR][TD]11[/TD][TD]3[/TD][TD]1[/TD][TD]1[/TD][/TR]

Land Reclamation Regulation was passed 10,940 votes to 3,324(76.7% support).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
IFV - For

Overview
"Land Reclamation Regulation" seeks to institute restrictions and concrete procedures for oceanic land reclamation. The proposal's primary effects include mandating that reclamation is conducted in an environmentally friendly manner and establishing a permit system for the authorization of land reclamation projects.

Recommendation
While inherently limited in scope and effect, this proposal nevertheless effectively regulates land reclamation and ensures that it meets an acceptable standard of environmental friendliness. Though the proposal's use of a WA committee for the purposes of reviewing land reclamation impact studies is arguably unnecessary, this execution does not detract from the proposal's effectiveness.

For these reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends voting For the at-vote General Assembly proposal, "Land Reclamation Regulation".
 
Last edited:
Against, I don’t think it *does* anything other than to say that impact studies need to be made. Is it a good idea? Sure, but if that’s all we want, I think it ought to be broader, if possible.
 
Against, I don’t think it *does* anything other than to say that impact studies need to be made. Is it a good idea? Sure, but if that’s all we want, I think it ought to be broader, if possible.
It also legislates on the use of materials, and the impact studies thing is a non-issue for me seeing as their only purpose is to ensure proper compliance with clause 3.
 
Against, I don’t think it *does* anything other than to say that impact studies need to be made. Is it a good idea? Sure, but if that’s all we want, I think it ought to be broader, if possible.
Incorrect. And the impact studies are very important
 
The Delegate has agreed to sponsor this proposal. Therefore, the Ministry will recommend a vote in favor unless substantial issues are brought to our attention.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top