Judgement call.
Kasch has spent the last four months learning the job after being elected by the supporters of Tomb on a ticket in May. He has peformed rather well given the sharper learning curve than he expected.
Better than the other coices
Well, I am Siwale
Was very close between Siwale and Kasch, but activity and timeliness edged Siwale ahead.
New blood, interested in seeing what Siwale would do with the position. He's qualified and seemed eager/hardworking enough. I'd seen what Kasch would do with it for 4 months already, figured get a look at another side.
Terrific term at Home Affairs, the Security Council will benefit from having such a proactive and innovative Vice Delegate.
Siwale realizes what Kasch failed to do, and plans to do it. Kasch doesn't see what he failed to do last term. Hong Kong isn't a viable candidate, so they aren't a good choice either.
Kasch and Siwale had differing views and thus it was hard to decide between both of them. After some dicussion I decided to support Siwale.
Change is bad
He seemed like a better choice than Kasch and Hong Kong.
Kasch is good Siwale is better, I like the push for SC accountability and activity.
Kasch sucks and I have no idea who Hong Kong is.
I support their ideals
Kasch had deficiencies in May and he still has many of them. He was not given the opportunity to be properly vetted in May and when it was done in this election he was lacking. He's improved but he is relying a great deal on his experience at Siwale's expense without adequately addressing the policy differences in their respective campaigns.
